Repository logo
 

Can Situational Action Theory Explain the Gender Gap in Adolescent Shoplifting? Results From Austria

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

Type

Article

Change log

Authors

Hirtenlehner, H 
Treiber, K 

Abstract

jats:pAlthough shoplifting is one of the crimes with the smallest gender gap among all offense types, most studies still conclude that males steal from shops more frequently than females. The roots of the gendered distribution of shoplifting have not yet been satisfactorily explained. This work investigates whether situational action theory (SAT) can account for males’ greater involvement in shoplifting compared to females and if the propensity–exposure interaction that is at the heart of the theory applies to both genders. Results from a large-scale student survey conducted in Austria suggest that SAT generalizes to both genders and that it is well suited to explain why males are more likely to shoplift than females.</jats:p>

Description

Keywords

situational action theory, shoplifting, juvenile delinquency, gender

Journal Title

International Criminal Justice Review

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

1057-5677
1556-3855

Volume Title

27

Publisher

SAGE Publications
Sponsorship
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/K010646/1)
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The research underlying this article was funded under grant no. SPA03–56 by the Sparkling Science Research Program of the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Research.