PFG NMR and Bayesian analysis to characterise non-Newtonian fluids Thomas W. Blythe, Andrew J. Sederman, E. Hugh Stitt, Andrew P.E. York, Lynn F. Gladden Journal of Magnetic Resonance 274 (2017) 103-114

Figure 1: Simulated displacement profiles (three example fluids) [.txt]

Figure 3(a): Simulated flow propagators [.txt] Figure 3(b): Simulated signals in q-space [.txt]

Figure 4(a): Simulated flow propagator [.txt] Figure 4(b): Simulated signal in q-space [.txt] Figure 4(c): Likelihood function [.txt] Figure 4(d): Experimental signal in q-space [.txt] Figure 4(e): Posterior probability distribution [.txt]

Figure 6: Shear rate vs. shear stress [.txt]

Figure 7: Posterior probability distribution [.txt]

Figure 8(a): Output n vs. input n (and uncertainty) [.txt] Figure 8(b): Output r0_R vs. input r0_R (and uncertainty) [.txt]

Figure 9(a): Output n vs. input n (and uncertainty) [.txt] Figure 9(b): Output n vs. input n (and uncertainty) [.txt]

Figure 10(a): Real components of experimental signals in q-space (for both fluids) [.txt] Figure 10(b): Imaginary components of experimental signals in q-space (for both fluids) [.txt]

Figure 11: Experimental flow propagators (for both fluids) [.txt]

Figure 12(a): Posterior probability distribution (for 0.1 wt% fluid) [.txt] Figure 12(b): Posterior probability distribution (for 0.2 wt% fluid) [.txt]

Figure 13(a): Estimate of n vs. number of q-space points (for both fluids) [.txt] Figure 13(b): Estimate of tau_0 vs. number of q-space points (for both fluids) [.txt]

Figure 14: Experimental displacement profiles (for both fluids) [.txt]

Figure 15(a): Shear stress vs. shear rate (for 0.1 wt% fluid using three methods) [.txt] Figure 15(b): Shear stress vs. shear rate (for 0.2 wt% fluid using three methods) [.txt]