Repository logo
 

Efficiency and safety of varying the frequency of whole blood donation: randomised trial of 45,000 donors

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Change log

Authors

Di Angelantonio, Emanuele  ORCID logo  https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8776-6719
Thompson, SG 
Walker, M 

Abstract

Background Limits on the frequency of whole blood donation exist primarily to safeguard donor health. However, there is substantial variation across blood services in the maximum frequency of donations allowed. We compared standard practice in the UK with shorter inter-donation intervals used in other countries. Methods In this parallel group, pragmatic, randomised trial, we recruited whole blood donors aged 18 years or older from 25 centres across England, UK. By use of a computer-based algorithm, men were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 12-week (standard) versus 10-week versus 8-week inter -donation intervals, and women were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 16-week (standard) versus 14-week versus 12-week intervals. Participants were not masked to their allocated intervention group. The primary outcome was the number of donations over 2 years. Secondary outcomes related to safety were quality of life, symptoms potentially related to donation, physical activity, cognitive function, haemoglobin and ferritin concentrations, and deferrals because of low haemoglobin. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN24760606, and is ongoing but no longer recruiting participants. Findings 45263 whole blood donors (22466 men, 22797 women) were recruited between June 11, 2012, and June 15, 2014. Data were analysed for 45042 (99·5%) participants. Men were randomly assigned to the 12-week (n=7452) versus 10-week (n=7449) versus 8-week (n=7456) groups; and women to the 16-week (n=7550) versus 14-week (n=7567) versus 12-week (n=7568) groups. In men, compared with the 12-week group, the mean amount of blood collected per donor over 2 years increased by 1·69 units (95% CI 1·59–1·80; approximately 795 mL) in the 8-week group and by 0·79 units (0·69–0·88; approximately 370 mL) in the 10-week group (p<0·0001 for both). In women, compared with the 16-week group, it increased by 0·84 units (95% CI 0·76–0·91; approximately 395 mL) in the 12-week group and by 0·46 units (0·39–0·53; approximately 215 mL) in the 14-week group (p<0·0001 for both). No significant differences were observed in quality of life, physical activity, or cognitive function across randomised groups. However, more frequent donation resulted in more donation-related symptoms (eg, tiredness, breathlessness, feeling faint, dizziness, and restless legs, especially among men [for all listed symptoms]), lower mean haemoglobin and ferritin concentrations, and more deferrals for low haemoglobin (p<0·0001 for each) than those observed in the standard frequency groups. Interpretation Over 2 years, more frequent donation than is standard practice in the UK collected substantially more blood without having a major effect on donors’ quality of life, physical activity, or cognitive function, but resulted in more donation-related symptoms, deferrals, and iron deficiency.

Description

Keywords

Adult, Age Factors, Anemia, Iron-Deficiency, Blood Donors, Efficiency, Female, Ferritins, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Safety, Risk Assessment, Sex Factors, Time Factors, United Kingdom, Young Adult

Journal Title

The Lancet

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

0140-6736
1474-547X

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier
Sponsorship
NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) (11-01-GEN)
Medical Research Council (MR/P02811X/1)
European Commission and European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) FP7 Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) (116074)
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH) (BRC)
British Heart Foundation (CH/12/2/29428)
Medical Research Council (MR/P013880/1)
Ume� University (unknown)
NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) (WP12-01)
European Commission (279143)
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH) (BRC 2012-2017)
British Heart Foundation (None)
Medical Research Council (MR/L003120/1)
European Commission (279233)
European Research Council (268834)
MRC (MR/J015709/1)
MRC (MR/J006602/1)
MRC (MR/J006599/1)
Medical Research Council (MR/M012816/1)
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH) (146281)
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH) (146281)
British Heart Foundation (RG/16/4/32218)
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH) (3819-1617-25)
Department of Health (via National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)) (NIHR BTRU-2014-10024)
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH) (3819-1516-29)
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH) (unknown)
Medical Research Council (G0800270)
British Heart Foundation (None)
British Heart Foundation (None)
Medical Research Council (MC_PC_12026)
Medical Research Council (G0800270/1)
EDA received research funding from the UK Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, National Institute for Health Research, and NHSBT during the conduct of the study. SGT received grants from the UK Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, National Institute for Health Research, and NHSBT during the conduct of the study. SK received grants from the UK Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, National Institute for Health Research, and NHSBT during the conduct of the study. JD has received research funding from the UK Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, National Institute for Health Research, NHSBT, European Commission, European Research Council, Merck Sharpe & Dohme UK, Biogen, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, and Wellcome Trust during the conduct of the study. All other members of the writing committee declare no competing interests. The trial was funded by NHSBT and the NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Donor Health and Genomics (NIHR BTRU-2014-10024). The trial’s coordinating centre at the Department of Public Health and Primary Care at the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, has received core support from the UK Medical Research Council (G0800270), British Heart Foundation (SP/09/002), and the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre. Investigators at the University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, have been supported by the Research and Development Programme of NHSBT, the NHSBT Howard Ostin Trust Fund, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre through the programme grant NIHR-RP-PG-0310-1004.