Repository logo
 

Why the Reward Structure of Science Makes Reproducibility Problems Inevitable

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

Type

Article

Change log

Authors

Heesen, RD 

Abstract

Recent philosophical work has praised the reward structure of science, while recent empirical work has shown that many scientific results may not be reproducible. I argue that the reward structure of science incentivizes scientists to focus on speed and impact at the expense of the reproducibility of their work, thus contributing to the so-called reproducibility crisis. I use a rational choice model to identify a set of sufficient conditions for this problem to arise, and I argue that these conditions plausibly apply to a wide range of research situations. Currently proposed solutions will not fully address this problem. Philosophical commentators should temper their optimism about the reward structure of science.

Description

Keywords

50 Philosophy and Religious Studies, 5002 History and Philosophy Of Specific Fields

Journal Title

The Journal of Philosophy

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

1939-8549
1939-8549

Volume Title

Publisher

F.J.E. Woodbridge : W.T. Bush
Sponsorship
Isaac Newton Trust (1608(ac))
Leverhulme Trust (ECF-2016-551)
This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation under grant SES 1254291 and by an Early Career Fellowship from the Leverhulme Trust and the Isaac Newton Trust.