Repository logo
 

When Time Is Critical, Is Informed Consent Less So? A Discussion of Patient Autonomy in Emergency Neurosurgery.

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

No Thumbnail Available

Type

Article

Change log

Authors

Muskens, Ivo S 
Gupta, Saksham 
Robertson, Faith C 
Moojen, Wouter A 
Kolias, Angelos G 

Abstract

Neurosurgical interventions frequently occur in an emergency setting. In this setting, patients often have impaired consciousness and are unable to directly express their values and wishes regarding their treatment. The limited time available for clinical decision making has great ethical implications, as the informed consent procedure may become compromised. The ethical situation may be further challenged by different views between the patient, family members, and the neurosurgeon; the presence of advance directives; the use of an innovative procedure; or if the procedure is part of a research project. This moral opinion piece presents the implications of time constraints and a lack of patient capacity for autonomous decision making in emergency neurosurgical situations. Potential solutions to these challenges are presented that may help to improve ethical patient management in emergency settings. Emergency neurosurgery challenges the respect of autonomy of the patient. The outcome in most scenarios will rely on the neurosurgeon acting in a professional way to manage each unique situation in an ethically sound manner.

Description

Keywords

Emergency, Ethics, Neurosurgery, Clinical Decision-Making, Emergency Medical Services, Humans, Informed Consent, Neurosurgical Procedures, Time-to-Treatment

Journal Title

World Neurosurg

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

1878-8750
1878-8769

Volume Title

125

Publisher

Elsevier BV