Repository logo
 

May Fourth as Constitutional Crisis

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

No Thumbnail Available

Type

Article

Change log

Authors

van de Ven, Johan 

Abstract

In this essay, I approach May Fourth in the spirit advocated by Raymond Geuss in Philosophy and Real Politics. Guess rejected what he calls an ‘ethics first’ type of political theorizing, that is, arguments about political action that privilege what ought to be, usually from a liberal perspective as in the case of John Rawls, to what actually happens in politics. Geuss insisted that analysing political events means examining the actions of persons as they use the power at their disposal to pursue a range of goals, not all of them well defined and often contradictory, while keeping in view the concrete alternatives available to them in a particular moment and recognizing that most actors are motivated be a desire to do good, no matter how fallible as human beings we all are.

Description

Keywords

Journal Title

Twenty-First Century

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

1005-2984

Volume Title

Publisher

Publisher DOI

Publisher URL

Rights

All rights reserved
Sponsorship
None