Repository logo
 

Can indirect estimation methods and the Medical Officer of Health Reports ‘correct’ distorted infant mortality rates reported by the Registrar-General? The case of London, 1896-1911

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

No Thumbnail Available

Type

Article

Change log

Authors

Abstract

The Registrar-General’s Returns are an integral source for historical demographers. Concerns have been raised however, over the geographical accuracy of their pre-1911 mortality figures when institutional deaths were not redistributed to place of residence. This paper determines the extent of the distortions caused by institutional mortality in the context of aggregate infant mortality rates for London’s registration sub-districts. The potential of two alternative methods to ‘correct’ these distortions is then assessed. The first method uses indirect estimation techniques based on data from the 1911 Fertility Census, and the second exploits the rich detail available from the Medical Officer of Health Reports. Through narrowing the focus to seven London registration sub-districts over the years 1896-1911, it is shown that both suggested alternative methods remove the institutional mortality biases found in the Registrar-General’s figures, yet they come with their own limitations.

Description

Keywords

44 Human Society, 4403 Demography, Generic health relevance, 3 Good Health and Well Being

Journal Title

Local Population Studies

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

0143-2974

Volume Title

106

Publisher

University of Hertfordshire

Rights

All rights reserved
Sponsorship
AHRC (2073853)
AHRC (2103876)