Repository logo
 

To regenerate or not to regenerate: Vertebrate model organisms of regeneration-competency and -incompetency.

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

No Thumbnail Available

Type

Article

Change log

Authors

Storer, Mekayla A 

Abstract

Why only certain species can regenerate their appendages (e.g. tails and limbs) remains one of the biggest mysteries of nature. Unlike anuran tadpoles and salamanders, humans and other mammals cannot regenerate their limbs, but can only regrow lost digit tips under specific circumstances. Numerous hypotheses have been postulated to explain regeneration-incompetency in mammals. By studying model organisms that show varying regenerative abilities, we now have more opportunities to uncover what contributes to regeneration-incompetency and functionally test which perturbations restore appendage regrowth. Particularly, Xenopus laevis tail and limb, and mouse digit tip model systems exhibit naturally occurring variations in regenerative capacities. Here, we discuss major hypotheses that are suggested to contribute to regeneration-incompetency, and how species with varying regenerative abilities reflect on these hypotheses.

Description

Keywords

Animals, Mice, Humans, Wound Healing, Regeneration, Extremities, Xenopus laevis, Larva, Mammals

Journal Title

Wound Repair Regen

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

1067-1927
1524-475X

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley
Sponsorship
Wellcome Trust (203151/Z/16/Z)
Medical Research Council (MC_PC_17230)