A summary of the research data supporting "Portable, desktop high-field magnet systems using bulk, single-grain RE-Ba-Cu-O high-temperature superconductors." 
The dataset related to this publication ("Tsui et al SUST Dataset 26-05-22.xlsx") can be opened in Microsoft Excel and is available at https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.82795

Sheet 1 (Fig. 1 - Pulse Pro AF vs Time): Magnetizing Pulse Waveform Data
Data plotted in figure 1, giving the time dependence of the applied field at different IGBT settings at 110 K.

Sheet 2 (Fig. 3 77 K 2D Scan): 2D Field Scan Data Above The ab-Plane
Trapped field distributions of all samples at 77 K using the field-cooling method. Data displayed in figure 3 are given here. Trapped field distributions of each 
sample at 77 K at 1.5 mm above the top surface are given.

Sheet 3 (Fig. 4 Single-Pulse TF vs AF): Single-Pulse Data Using The Solensoid System
Trapped field data using the single-pulsed method at different temperatures. Data plotted in figure 4, giving the applied field dependence of the trapped field for 
each sample at different temperature using the single-pulse method. All data were taken using the solenoid system.

Sheet 4 (Fig. 5 TSMP TF vs Distribution): Two-Step Multi-Pulse (TSMP) Data Using The Solensoid System
Data plotted in figure 5, giving the trapped field achieved in all samples using optimal TSMP sequence. First magnetizing pulse was applied at 77 K for all samples. 
The second magnetizing pulse was applied at temperatures 45 to 49 K. Data for trapped field distributions for EuBCO sample when the applied field was increased from the optimal value of 4.4 T to 
4.7 T was also included here.

Sheet 5 (Fig. 6 EuBCO TF vs Time): TSMP data: Trapped Field vs Time For The EuBCO Sample
Data plotted in figure 6 are given here, showing the time dependence of the trapped field after applying the second magnetizing pulse for the EuBCO sample at 45 K. 
One of the pulse was at the optimal value of 4.4 T and the other one was at a higher value of 4.7 T.

Sheet 6 (Fig. 7 SP split and solenoid): Compare The Single-Pulse Results Obtained Using The Solenoid And Split Coil Systems For The GdBCO Sample.
Trapped field data using the single-pulsed method in both solenoid and split coil systems at 77, 65 and 55 K for the GdBCO sample. Data taken with and without iron
yokes in the split coil system are also included.
Data plotted in figure 7 are given here.

Sheet 7 (Fig. 8 MP split and solenoid ): Compare The TSMP Results Obtained Using The Split Coil System For The GdBCO Sample.
Trapped field data using the TSMP method in the split coil system with and without iron yokes for the GdBCO sample. Both TSMP pulsing sequences are the optimal
sequences.
Data plotted in figure 8 are given here.