Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHughes, Annaen
dc.contributor.authorTroscianko, Jolyonen
dc.contributor.authorStevens, Martinen
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-18T13:41:43Z
dc.date.available2014-09-18T13:41:43Z
dc.date.issued2014-09-13en
dc.identifier.citationBMC Evolutionary Biology 2014, 14:201. doi:10.1186/s12862-014-0201-4en
dc.identifier.issn1471-2148
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/245987
dc.description.abstractBackground: Stripes and other high contrast patterns found on animals have been hypothesised to cause “motion dazzle”, a type of defensive coloration that operates when in motion, causing predators to misjudge the speed and direction of object movement. Several recent studies have found some support for this idea, but little is currently understood about the mechanisms underlying this effect. Using humans as model ‘predators’ in a touch screen experiment we investigated further the effectiveness of striped targets in preventing capture, and considered how stripes compare to other types of patterning in order to understand what aspects of target patterning are important in making a target difficult to capture. Results: We find that striped targets are among the most difficult to capture, but that other patterning types are also highly effective at preventing capture in this task. Several target types, including background sampled targets and targets with a ‘spot’ on were significantly easier to capture than striped targets. We also show differences in capture attempt rates between different target types, but we find no differences in learning rates between target types. Conclusions: We conclude that striped targets are effective in preventing capture, but are not uniquely difficult to catch, with luminance matched grey targets also showing a similar capture rate. We show that key factors in making capture easier are a lack of average background luminance matching and having trackable ‘features’ on the target body. We also find that striped patterns are attempted relatively quickly, despite being difficult to catch. We discuss these findings in relation to the motion dazzle hypothesis and how capture rates may be affected more generally by pattern type.
dc.description.sponsorshipAEH received a studentship from the BBSRC and a CASE award from Dstl, Portsdown West, UK. MS and JT were supported by a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, David Phillips Research Fellowship (BB/G022887/1).
dc.languageEnglishen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.rightsAttribution 2.0 UK: England & Wales*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/*
dc.subjectMotion dazzleen
dc.subjectvisionen
dc.subjectanimal colorationen
dc.titleMotion dazzle and the effects of target patterning on capture successen
dc.typeArticle
dc.description.versionThis is the final published version. It is published by BioMed Central in BMC Evolutionary Biology here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/14/201.en
prism.publicationDate2014en
prism.publicationNameBMC Evolutionary Biologyen
prism.volume14en
dc.rioxxterms.funderBBSRC
dc.rioxxterms.projectidBB/G022887/1
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-09-09en
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s12862-014-0201-4en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2014-09-13en
dc.contributor.orcidHughes, Anna [0000-0003-2677-1965]
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2148
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen
pubs.funder-project-idBBSRC (BB/G022887/1)


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 2.0 UK: England & Wales
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 2.0 UK: England & Wales