Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDean, Jamesen
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Jamesen
dc.contributor.authorAldrich-Smith, Gen
dc.contributor.authorClyne, Billen
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-24T14:07:32Z
dc.date.available2014-09-24T14:07:32Z
dc.date.issued2014en
dc.identifier.citationDean et al. Acta Materialia (2014) Vol. 80, pp. 56–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.07.054
dc.identifier.issn1359-6454
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/246033
dc.description.abstractA technique for evaluating the (steady-state) creep stress exponent (n) from indentation data has come into common use over recent years. It involves monitoring the indenter displacement history under constant load and assuming that, once its velocity has stabilised, the system is in a quasisteady state, with Stage II creep dominating the behaviour. The stress field under the indenter, and the way in which the creep strain field is changing there, are then represented by "equivalent stress" and "equivalent strain rate" values. These are manipulated in a similar manner to that conventionally employed with (uniaxial) creep test data, allowing the stress exponent, n, to be obtained as the gradient of a plot of the logarithm of the equivalent strain rate against the logarithm of the equivalent stress. The procedure is therefore a very simple one, often carried out over relatively short timescales (of the order of an hour or less). However, concerns have been expressed about its reliability, regarding the neglect of primary creep (after a very short initial transient) and about the validity of representing the stress and strain rate via these "equivalent" values. In this paper, comprehensive experimental data (both from a conventional, uniaxial loading set-up and from instrumented indentation over a range of conditions) are presented for two materials, focussing entirely on ambient temperature testing. This is supplemented by predictions from numerical (FEM) modelling. It is shown that the methodology is fundamentally flawed, commonly giving unreliable (and often very high) values for n. The reasons for this are outlined in some detail. An attempt is made to identify measures that might improve the reliability of the procedure, although it is concluded that there is no simple analysis of this type that can be recommended.
dc.description.sponsorshipRCUK, Other
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsAttribution 2.0 UK: England & Wales
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/
dc.subjectnanoindentationen
dc.subjectfinite element analysisen
dc.subjectcreepen
dc.titleA Critical Assessment of the "Stable Indenter Velocity" Method for Obtaining the Creep Stress Exponent from Indentation Dataen
dc.typeArticle
prism.endingPage66
prism.publicationDate2014en
prism.startingPage56
prism.volume80en
dc.rioxxterms.funderEPSRC
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.actamat.2014.07.054en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2014en
dc.contributor.orcidCampbell, James [0000-0001-9158-1418]
dc.contributor.orcidClyne, Bill [0000-0003-2163-1840]
dc.identifier.eissn1873-2453
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen
pubs.funder-project-idEPSRC (EP/I038691/1)


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 2.0 UK: England & Wales
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 2.0 UK: England & Wales