Comparison of Inter Subject Variability and Reproducibility of Whole Brain Proton Spectroscopy
Veenith, Tonny V
Maudsley, Andrew A
MetadataShow full item record
Veenith, T. V., Mada, M., Carter, E., Grossac, J., Newcombe, V., Outtrim, J., Lupson, V., et al. (2014). Comparison of Inter Subject Variability and Reproducibility of Whole Brain Proton Spectroscopy. PLoS ONE, 9 (e115304)https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115304
The aim of these studies was to provide reference data on intersubject variability and reproducibility of metabolite ratios for Choline/Creatine (Cho/Cr), N-acetyl aspartate/Choline (NAA/Cho) and N-acetyl aspartate/Creatine (NAA/Cr), and individual signal-intensity normalised metabolite concentrations of NAA, Cho and Cr. Healthy volunteers underwent imaging on two occasions using the same 3T Siemens Verio magnetic resonance scanner. At each session two identical Metabolic Imaging and Data Acquisition Software (MIDAS) sequences were obtained along with standard structural imaging. Metabolite maps were created and regions of interest applied in normalised space. The baseline data from all 32 volunteers were used to calculate the intersubject variability, while within session and between session reproducibility were calculated from all the available data. The reproducibility of measurements were used to calculate the overall and within session 95% prediction interval for zero change. The within and between session reproducibility data were lower than the values for intersubject variability, and were variable across the different brain regions. The within and between session reproducibility measurements were similar for Cho/Cr, NAA/Choline, Cho and Cr (11.8%, 11.4%, 14.3 and 10.6% vs. 11.9%, 11.4%, 13.5% and 10.5% respectively), but for NAA/Creatine and NAA between session reproducibility was lower (9.3% and 9.1% vs. 10.1% and 9.9%; p <0.05). This study provides additional reference data that can be utilised in interventional studies to quantify change within a single imaging session, or to assess the significance of change in longitudinal studies of brain injury and disease.
TV Veenith was supported by clinical research training fellowship from the National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia and Raymond Beverly Sackler studentship. VFJN is supported by an NIHR academic clinical fellowship. JPC was supported by Wellcome trust project grant. DKM is supported by an NIHR Senior Investigator Award. This work was supported by a Medical Research Council (UK) Program Grant (Acute brain injury: heterogeneity of mechanisms, therapeutic targets and outcome effects (G9439390 ID 65883)), the UK National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Cambridge, and the Technology Platform funding provided by the UK Department of Health.
MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (G0001354)
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115304
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/246810
Attribution 2.0 UK: England & Wales
Licence URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/
Recommended or similar items
The following licence files are associated with this item: