Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBalasooriya-Smeekens, Chantalen
dc.contributor.authorBateman, Andrewen
dc.contributor.authorMant, Jonathanen
dc.contributor.authorDe, Simoni Annaen
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-17T13:24:18Z
dc.date.available2016-02-17T13:24:18Z
dc.date.issued2016-04-06en
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open 2016; 6: e009974. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009974en
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/253817
dc.description.abstractObjective: To explore barriers and facilitators to staying in work following stroke. Design: Qualitative analysis of posts regarding staying in work following stroke using the archives of an online forum for stroke survivors. Participants: 60 stroke survivors (29M, 23F, 8 not stated; mean age at stroke 44y) who have returned to work, identified using terms ‘return to work’ and ‘back at work’. Setting: Posts from UK stroke survivors and family members on Talkstroke, the forum of the Stroke Association, between 2004 and 2011. Results: Both stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA) survivors reported residual impairments that for many had impact on work. Most impairments were ‘invisible’, including fatigue, problems with concentration, memory, and personality changes. Participants described both positive (e.g. back at work being better than expected) and negative work experiences, including being at risk of losing the job because of stroke-related impairments. Barriers to successfully staying in work included lack of understanding of stroke - in particular invisible impairments - of survivors, employers and General Practitioners (GPs), and lack of support in terms of formal adjustments, and ‘feeling supported’. Stroke survivors described how they developed their own coping strategies, and how workplace and employer helped them to stay in work. Conclusions: Despite having been able to return to work after a stroke, people may still experience difficulties in staying in work and risking losing their job. There is a need to improve awareness, in particular of invisible stroke-related impairments, among stroke survivors, work personnel and clinicians. This might be achieved through improved assessments of residual impairments both in the workplace and in General Practice. Future studies should investigate the effect of unrecognised fatigue and invisible impairments on staying in work following stroke, and explore the potential role for primary care in supporting stroke survivors who have returned to employment. Strengths and limitations of this study: • This is the first study that used online forum data to explore barriers and facilitators to staying in work after stroke/TIA, and complements the current evidence that is focussed mainly on returning to work. • The study used a novel methodological approach by qualitatively analysing posts of patients on an online forum, which allowed for naturalistic data collection without involvement of a researcher. However, a limitation of this approach is that no follow-up questions could be asked from patients.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by the Evelyn Trust. Anna De Simoni is funded by a NIHR Academic Clinical Lectureship. Andrew Bateman was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East of England at Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.
dc.languageEnglishen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing
dc.rightsAttribution 2.0 UK: England & Wales
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution License 2.0 UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/
dc.subjectStrokeen
dc.subjectEmploymenten
dc.subjectInvisible Impairmentsen
dc.subjectQualitative Researchen
dc.subjectPrimary Health Careen
dc.titleBarriers and facilitators to staying in work after stroke: insight from an online forumen
dc.typeArticle
dc.provenanceOA-7076
dc.description.versionThis is the final published version. It first appeared at http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/4/e009974.abstract.en
prism.numbere009974en
prism.publicationDate2016en
prism.publicationNameBMJ Openen
prism.volume6en
dc.rioxxterms.funderNIHR
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-02-02en
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009974en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-04-06en
dc.contributor.orcidBateman, Andrew [0000-0002-2547-5921]
dc.contributor.orcidMant, Jonathan [0000-0002-9531-0268]
dc.identifier.eissn2044-6055
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 2.0 UK: England & Wales
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 2.0 UK: England & Wales