Repository logo
 

Biodiversity offsetting and the reframing of conservation: A reply to ten Kate & von Hase and Dempsey & Collard

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

No Thumbnail Available

Type

Article

Change log

Authors

Apostolopoulou, Elia  ORCID logo  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8166-4639
Adams, WM 

Abstract

jats:pWe are grateful to ten Kate & von Hase (2016) and Dempsey & Collard (2016) for their insightful and constructive responses to our article on biodiversity offsetting (Apostolopoulou & Adams, 2015a). They agree with us that conservationists need to think very carefully about offsetting and its implications for nature conservation. They differ substantially in where that thinking should lead. Ten Kate & von Hase believe that offsetting is fine if it is done properly. Dempsey & Collard are profoundly uneasy about its implications, and go deeper into the way conservation is folded into economic development, ‘smoothing the way for new industrial scale projects’.</jats:p>

Description

Keywords

31 Biological Sciences, 3103 Ecology, 4104 Environmental Management, 3109 Zoology, 41 Environmental Sciences

Journal Title

ORYX

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

0030-6053
1365-3008

Volume Title

51

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Sponsorship
European Commission (622631)