Repository logo
 

Strategies for managing rival bacterial communities: Lessons from burying beetles.

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

No Thumbnail Available

Type

Article

Change log

Authors

Welch, Martin 
Swannack, Chris 
Wagner, Josef 
Kilner, Rebecca M 

Abstract

The role of bacteria in animal development, ecology and evolution is increasingly well understood, yet little is known of how animal behaviour affects bacterial communities. Animals that benefit from defending a key resource from microbial competitors are likely to evolve behaviours to control or manipulate the animal's associated external microbiota. We describe four possible mechanisms by which animals could gain a competitive edge by disrupting a rival bacterial community: "weeding," "seeding," "replanting" and "preserving." By combining detailed behavioural observations with molecular and bioinformatic analyses, we then test which of these mechanisms best explains how burying beetles, Nicrophorus vespilloides, manipulate the bacterial communities on their carcass breeding resource. Burying beetles are a suitable species to study how animals manage external microbiota because reproduction revolves around a small vertebrate carcass. Parents shave a carcass and apply antimicrobial exudates on its surface, shaping it into an edible nest for their offspring. We compared bacterial communities in mice carcasses that were either fresh, prepared by beetles or unprepared but buried underground for the same length of time. We also analysed bacterial communities in the burying beetle's gut, during and after breeding, to understand whether beetles could be "seeding" the carcass with particular microbes. We show that burying beetles do not "preserve" the carcass by reducing bacterial load, as is commonly supposed. Instead, our results suggest they "seed" the carcass with bacterial groups which are part of the Nicrophorus core microbiome. They may also "replant" other bacteria from the carcass gut onto the surface of their carrion nest. Both these processes may lead to the observed increase in bacterial load on the carcass surface in the presence of beetles. Beetles may also "weed" the bacterial community by eliminating some groups of bacteria on the carcass, perhaps through the production of antimicrobials themselves. Whether these alterations to the bacterial community are adaptive from the beetle's perspective, or are simply a by-product of the way in which the beetles prepare the carcass for reproduction, remains to be determined in future work. In general, our work suggests that animals might use more sophisticated techniques for attacking and disrupting rival microbial communities than is currently appreciated.

Description

Keywords

animal behaviour, antimicrobials, microbiome, social immunity, Animals, Bacteria, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena, Behavior, Animal, Biodiversity, Body Remains, Coleoptera, Mice

Journal Title

J Anim Ecol

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

0021-8790
1365-2656

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley
Sponsorship
Natural Environment Research Council (NE/H019731/1)
Isaac Newton Trust (Minutre 925(ac))
European Research Council (310785)
The Royal Society (wm140111)
NERC ERC Royal Society