The difficult legacy of Turing’s wager
View / Open Files
Publication Date
2017-08Journal Title
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
ISSN
0929-5313
Publisher
Springer
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
1-4
Language
English
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Thwaites, A., Soltan, A., Wieser, E., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (2017). The difficult legacy of Turing’s wager. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 43 (1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-017-0651-y
Abstract
Describing the human brain in mathematical terms is an important ambition of neuroscience research, yet the challenges remain considerable. It was Alan Turing, writing in 1950, who first sought to demonstrate how time-consuming such an undertaking would be. Through analogy to the computer program, Turing argued that arriving at a complete mathematical description of the mind would take well over a thousand years. In this opinion piece, we argue that — despite seventy years of progress in the field — his arguments remain both prescient and persuasive.
Keywords
computational neuroscience, philosophy of neuroscience, policy, Alan Turing
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-017-0651-y
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/266621
Rights
Attribution 4.0 International, Attribution 4.0 International
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.