AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews – paper 2: defining complexity, formulating scope, and questions
dc.contributor.author | Kelly, Mike | en |
dc.contributor.author | Noyes, J | en |
dc.contributor.author | Kane, RL | en |
dc.contributor.author | Chang, C | en |
dc.contributor.author | Uhl, S | en |
dc.contributor.author | Robinson, KA | en |
dc.contributor.author | Springs, S | en |
dc.contributor.author | Butler, ME | en |
dc.contributor.author | Guise, J-M | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-23T14:32:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-23T14:32:13Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0895-4356 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/266781 | |
dc.description.abstract | $\textbf{Background:}$ The early stages of a systematic review set the scope and expectations. This can be particularly challenging for complex interventions given their multidimensional and dynamic nature. $\textbf{Rationale:}$ This paper builds on concepts introduced in paper 1 of this series. It describes the methodological, practical, and philosophical challenges and potential approaches for formulating the questions and scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Furthermore, it discusses the use of theory to help organize reviews of complex interventions. $\textbf{Discussion:}$ Many interventions in medicine, public health, education, social services, behavioral health, and community programs are complex, and they may not fit neatly within the established paradigm for reviews of straightforward interventions. This paper provides conceptual and operational guidance for these early stages of scope formulation to assist authors of systematic reviews of complex interventions. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | This project was funded under Contract No. HHSA290201200004C from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) , U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en |
dc.subject | complex interventions | en |
dc.subject | evidence-based medicine | en |
dc.subject | review literature as topic | en |
dc.subject | systematic review | en |
dc.subject | qualitative research | en |
dc.subject | research design | en |
dc.title | AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews – paper 2: defining complexity, formulating scope, and questions | en |
dc.type | Article | |
prism.publicationName | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.17863/CAM.10909 | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2017-06-08 | en |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.012 | en |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en |
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2017-06-08 | en |
dc.contributor.orcid | Kelly, Mike [0000-0002-2029-5841] | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1878-5921 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en |
cam.issuedOnline | 2017-07-14 | en |
cam.orpheus.success | Thu Jan 30 12:59:29 GMT 2020 - The item has an open VoR version. | * |
rioxxterms.freetoread.startdate | 2100-01-01 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Scholarly Works - Public Health and Primary Care - Primary Care Unit
Includes the Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease Group, the Behavioural Science Group, a Department of Health Policy Research Unit on Behaviour and Health, the Cancer, Genetics and Palliative Care Group, and the Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research