Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLove, Rebecca E
dc.contributor.authorAdams, Jean
dc.contributor.authorvan Sluijs, Esther M F
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-03T06:02:33Z
dc.date.available2017-10-03T06:02:33Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-02
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2017 Oct 02;14(1):134
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/267511
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Differential effects of physical activity (PA) interventions across population sub-groups may contribute to inequalities in health. This systematic scoping review explored the state of the evidence on equity effects in response to interventions targeting children’s PA promotion. The aims were to assess and summarise the availability of evidence on differential intervention effects of children’s PA interventions across gender, body mass index, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, place of residence and religion. Methods Using a pre-piloted search strategy, six electronic databases were searched for controlled intervention trials, aiming to increase PA in children (6–18 years of age), that used objective forms of measurement. Screening and data extraction were conducted in duplicate. Reporting of analyses of differential effects were summarized for each equity characteristic and logistic regression analyses run to investigate intervention characteristics associated with the reporting of equity analyses. Results The literature search identified 13,052 publications and 7963 unique records. Following a duplicate screening process 125 publications representing 113 unique intervention trials were included. Although the majority of trials collected equity characteristics at baseline, few reported differential effects analyses across the equity factors of interest. All 113 included interventions reported gender at baseline with 46% of non-gender targeted interventions reporting differential effect analyses by gender. Respective figures were considerably smaller for body mass index, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, place of residence and religion. There was an increased likelihood of studying differential effects in school based interventions (OR: 2.9 [1.2–7.2]) in comparison to interventions in other settings, larger studies (per increase in 100 participants; 1.2 [1.0 – 1.4]); and where a main intervention effect on objectively measured PA was reported (3.0 [1.3–6.8]). Conclusions Despite regularly collecting relevant information at baseline, most controlled trials of PA interventions in children do not report analyses of differences in intervention effect across outlined equity characteristics. Consequently, there is a scarcity of evidence concerning the equity effects of these interventions, particularly beyond gender, and a lack of understanding of subgroups that may benefit from, or be disadvantaged by, current intervention efforts. Further evidence synthesis and primary research is needed to effectively understand the impact of PA interventions on existing behavioural inequalities within population subgroups of children. Trial registration PROSPERO (PROSPERO 2016: CRD42016034020 ).
dc.rightsAll Rights Reserveden
dc.rights.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/en
dc.titleEquity effects of children’s physical activity interventions: a systematic scoping review
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2017-10-03T06:02:28Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.13450
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s12966-017-0586-8


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record