Associations between bacterial infections and blood pressure in pregnancy
Publication Date
2017-10Journal Title
Pregnancy Hypertension: An International Journal of Women's Cardiovascular Health
ISSN
2210-7789
Publisher
Elsevier
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Petry, C., Ong, K., Hughes, I., Acerini, C., & Dunger, D. (2017). Associations between bacterial infections and blood pressure in pregnancy. Pregnancy Hypertension: An International Journal of Women's Cardiovascular Health https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2017.09.004
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that bacterial infections in pregnancy are related to maternal blood pressure. STUDY DESIGN: Bacterial infection was assessed using antibiotic usage as a surrogate and its association with blood pressure in pregnancy tested in the Cambridge Baby Growth Study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Antibiotic usage in pregnancy was self-reported in questionnaires. Blood pressure measurements at four time points in pregnancy were collected from the hospital notes of 622 women. RESULTS: Using all the available blood pressure readings (adjusted for weeks gestation) antibiotic usage was associated with a higher mean arterial blood pressure across pregnancy: antibiotics used 85 (84, 87) mmHg vs. no antibiotics used 83 (83, 84) mmHg (β = 2.3 (0.6, 4.0) mmHg, p = 9.6 × 10−3, from 621 individuals). Further analysis revealed that antibiotic usage was associated with diastolic (β = 2.3 (0.6, 4.0) mmHg; p = 7.0 × 10−3) more than systolic blood pressure (β = 1.4 (−0.9, 3.7) mmHg; p = 0.2). The effect size associated with antibiotic usage appeared to rise slightly after the first trimester. CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial infection in pregnancy, as assessed by self-reported antibiotic usage, is associated with small rises in blood pressure.
Keywords
pregnancy, antibiotics, pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension
Sponsorship
Funding for this study has come from the Evelyn Trust (EW9035322), Diabetes UK (11/0004241) and the Wellbeing of Women (the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, UK) (RG1644). Other core funding has come from the Medical Research Council (7500001180), European Union Framework 5 (QLK4-1999-01422), the Mothercare Charitable Foundation (RG54608), Newlife Foundation for Disabled Children (07/20), and the World Cancer Research Fund International (2004/03). In addition, there has been support from National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre. The sponsors did not have any role in the study design, in the collection, analysis or the interpretation of the data, in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to submit it for publication.
Funder references
Wellbeing of Women (RG1644)
MRC Epidemiology Unit (7500001180)
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH)
Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12015/2)
Medical Research Council (G0600717)
Medical Research Council (G0500733)
Diabetes UK (11/0004241)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2017.09.004
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/268128
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International, Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International, Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International, Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International, Attribution 4.0 International
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The following licence files are associated with this item: