Understanding conservationists' perspectives on the new-conservation debate.
View / Open Files
Publication Date
2017-04Journal Title
Conserv Biol
ISSN
0888-8892
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
353-363
Language
eng
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Physical Medium
Print-Electronic
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Holmes, G., Sandbrook, C., & Fisher, J. A. (2017). Understanding conservationists' perspectives on the new-conservation debate.. Conserv Biol, 31 (2), 353-363. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12811
Abstract
A vibrant debate about the future direction of biodiversity conservation centers on the merits of the so-called new conservation. Proponents of the new conservation advocate a series of positions on key conservation ideas, such as the importance of human-dominated landscapes and conservation's engagement with capitalism. These have been fiercely contested in a debate dominated by a few high-profile individuals, and so far there has been no empirical exploration of existing perspectives on these issues among a wider community of conservationists. We used Q methodology to examine empirically perspectives on the new conservation held by attendees at the 2015 International Congress for Conservation Biology (ICCB). Although we identified a consensus on several key issues, 3 distinct positions emerged: in favor of conservation to benefit people but opposed to links with capitalism and corporations, in favor of biocentric approaches but with less emphasis on wilderness protection than prominent opponents of new conservation, and in favor of the published new conservation perspective but with less emphasis on increasing human well-being as a goal of conservation. Our results revealed differences between the debate on the new conservation in the literature and views held within a wider, but still limited, conservation community and demonstrated the existence of at least one viewpoint (in favor of conservation to benefit people but opposed to links with capitalism and corporations) that is almost absent from the published debate. We hope the fuller understanding we present of the variety of views that exist but have not yet been heard, will improve the quality and tone of debates on the subject.
Keywords
Humans, Biology, Conservation of Natural Resources, Biodiversity, Organizations, Wilderness
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12811
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/268496
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The following licence files are associated with this item: