Repository logo
 

Sensorineural hearing loss enhances auditory sensitivity and temporal integration for amplitude modulation.

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

No Thumbnail Available

Type

Article

Change log

Authors

Wallaert, Nicolas 
Moore, Brian CJ 
Ewert, Stephan D 
Lorenzi, Christian 

Abstract

Amplitude-modulation detection thresholds (AMDTs) were measured at 40 dB sensation level for listeners with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss (age: 50-64 yr) for a carrier frequency of 500 Hz and rates of 2 and 20 Hz. The number of modulation cycles, N, varied between two and nine. The data were compared with AMDTs measured for young and older normal-hearing listeners [Wallaert, Moore, and Lorenzi (2016). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 139, 3088-3096]. As for normal-hearing listeners, AMDTs were lower for the 2-Hz than for the 20-Hz rate, and AMDTs decreased with increasing N. AMDTs were lower for hearing-impaired listeners than for normal-hearing listeners, and the effect of increasing N was greater for hearing-impaired listeners. A computational model based on the modulation-filterbank concept and a template-matching decision strategy was developed to account for the data. The psychophysical and simulation data suggest that the loss of amplitude compression in the impaired cochlea is mainly responsible for the enhanced sensitivity and temporal integration of temporal envelope cues found for hearing-impaired listeners. The data also suggest that, for AM detection, cochlear damage is associated with increased internal noise, but preserved short-term memory and decision mechanisms.

Description

Keywords

1109 Neurosciences, Neurosciences, Clinical Research, Assistive Technology, Bioengineering, Prevention, Rehabilitation, Ear, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors

Journal Title

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

0001-4966
1520-8524

Volume Title

141

Publisher

Acoustical Society of America
Sponsorship
European Commission (39297)
N.W. was supported by a grant from Neurelec Oticon Medical. C.L. was supported by two grants from ANR (HEARFIN and HEART projects). S.D.E. was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) FOR 1732 (TPE). B.C.J.M. was supported by the EPSRC (UK, grant RG78536). This work was also supported by ANR-11-0001-02 PSL* and ANR-10-LABX-0087. We thank Nihaad Paraouty and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions relating to this study.