Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBruce-Lockhart, Katherine deVries
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-14T09:28:36Z
dc.date.available2017-11-14T09:28:36Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/269035
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation is a social history of the Uganda Prisons Service in the late colonial and early post-colonial periods. Focusing particularly on prison officers, it advances four key arguments. Firstly, it argues that global visions of the prison were crucial in shaping the Service’s development, its institutional culture, and the professional identities of its personnel. From the late colonial period onwards, this vision was anchored on notions of penal welfarism, which positioned the prison as a centre of rehabilitation, staffed by professionals who possessed technical expertise. Secondly, the penal welfare model was combined with an emphasis on the prison’s role as a driver of economic development and a source of public revenue – features that were seen as compatible with penal modernity. Thirdly, this vision of the prison gave the Service a particular imaginative capital, which prison officers used as an important resource. It provided them with a common set of principles and norms through which to define their professional role. Senior officers adopted it with alacrity, pursuing further professionalization through engagement with transnational penal reform networks. Others summoned it as a source of claim-making, using it to call on the state to provide them with greater benefits and treat them as respectable public servants. Finally, visions of penal modernity and professionalism were contested throughout the periods under study, leading officers to engage in boundary work. Officers were regularly defining their role in relation to other spaces of incarceration, such as local government prisons and informal detention sites. With the take-over of Idi Amin in 1971 and the militarization of the state, prison officers’ professional identities were profoundly challenged, but also became particularly important, providing them with a conceptual boundary that at least partially demarcated them from Amin’s regime. Ultimately, the case of the Uganda Prisons Service reminds us of the importance of studying prisons beyond their coercive capacities, paying attention to how such institutions became the focal point of debates over modernity, authority, and professionalism. More broadly, this study challenges the narrative of failure that has dominated popular and scholarly portrayals of state institutions on the African continent, rejecting generic depictions of the postcolony as a site of chaos and disorder.
dc.description.sponsorshipGates Cambridge Trust, Trinity External Research Studentship (Honorary), Smuts Memorial Fund
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsNo Creative Commons licence (All rights reserved)
dc.rightsAll Rights Reserveden
dc.rights.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/en
dc.subjectUganda
dc.subjectPrisons
dc.subjectIdi Amin
dc.subjectPost-colonial
dc.subjectMilton Obote
dc.subjectModernity
dc.subjectProfessionals
dc.subjectLate colonial
dc.subjectPunishment
dc.titleImagining Modernity in the Uganda Prisons Service, 1945-1979
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoral
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cambridge
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of History
dc.date.updated2017-11-14T00:01:17Z
dc.rights.generalPermission acquired from The National Archives of the United Kingdom for use of image, permission to take photographs for research purposes from Uganda Prisons Service.
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.15241
dc.contributor.orcidBruce-Lockhart, Katherine deVries [0000-0002-1087-9077]
dc.publisher.collegeTrinity College
dc.type.qualificationtitlePhD in History
cam.supervisorMaxwell , David
cam.supervisorHunter , Emma
rioxxterms.freetoread.startdate2020-07-19


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record