Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChami, GF
dc.contributor.authorAhnert, SE
dc.contributor.authorKabatereine, NB
dc.contributor.authorTukahebwa, EM
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-22T15:33:14Z
dc.date.available2017-11-22T15:33:14Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-05
dc.identifier.issn0027-8424
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/269572
dc.description.abstractCommunity health interventions often seek to intentionally destroy paths between individuals to prevent the spread of communicable diseases. Immunizing individuals through direct vaccination or the provision of health education prevents pathogen transmission and the propagation of misinformation concerning medical treatments. Yet, it remains an open question whether network-based strategies should be used in place of conventional field approaches to target individuals for medical treatment in low-income countries. We collected complete friendship and health advice networks in 17 rural villages of Mayuge District, Uganda. Here we show that acquaintance algorithms, i.e. selecting neighbors of randomly selected nodes, were systematically more efficient in fragmenting all networks than targeting well-established community roles, i.e. health workers, village government members, and schoolteachers. Additionally, community roles were not good proxy indicators of physical proximity to other households or connections to many sick people. We also show that acquaintance algorithms were effective in offsetting potential noncompliance with deworming treatments for 16,357 individuals during mass drug administration (MDA). Health advice networks were destroyed more easily than friendship networks. Only an average of 32% of nodes were removed from health advice networks to reduce the percentage of nodes at risk of refusing treatment in MDA to below 25%. Treatment compliance of at least 75% is needed in MDA to control human morbidity attributable to parasitic worms and progress towards elimination. Our findings point toward the potential use of network-based approaches as an alternative to role-based strategies for targeting individuals in rural health interventions.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was financially supported by the Vice Chancellor’s Fund of the University of Cambridge, the Schistosomiasis Control Initiative, the Wellcome Trust Programme Grant 083931/Z/07/Z, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research Grant 452-04-333, and the Isaac Newton Trust and King’s College, Cambridge Fellowships to G.F.C.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherNational Academy of Sciences
dc.subjectcommunity health
dc.subjectimmunization
dc.subjectmass drug administration
dc.subjectpercolation
dc.subjectsocial networks
dc.subjectAlgorithms
dc.subjectFriends
dc.subjectHealth Education
dc.subjectHealth Personnel
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectImmunization Programs
dc.subjectInfection Control
dc.subjectMass Drug Administration
dc.subjectParasitic Diseases
dc.subjectPublic Health
dc.subjectRural Population
dc.subjectSocial Support
dc.subjectTreatment Refusal
dc.subjectUganda
dc.titleSocial network fragmentation and community health
dc.typeArticle
prism.endingPageE7431
prism.number36
prism.publicationDate2017
prism.publicationNameProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States
prism.startingPageE7425
prism.volume114
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.15799
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-06-27
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1073/pnas.1700166114
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-09-05
dc.identifier.eissn1091-6490
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
pubs.funder-project-idGatsby Charitable Foundation (GAT3395/CCD)
pubs.funder-project-idWellcome Trust (083931/Z/07/Z)
cam.issuedOnline2017-07-24
datacite.issupplementedby.doi10.17863/CAM.26430
datacite.issourceof.doi10.17863/CAM.15616
rioxxterms.freetoread.startdate2018-01-24


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record