Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTanentzap, Andrewen
dc.contributor.authorLloyd, KMen
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-06T14:47:22Z
dc.date.available2017-12-06T14:47:22Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-01en
dc.identifier.issn0006-3207
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/269998
dc.description.abstractLarge areas of habitat are being fenced globally to restore and relocate species that can no longer survive in their surrounding landscapes, such as because of introduced predators. Despite their promise, the contributions of fenced and intensively-managed reserves towards achieving wider biodiversity goals are contentious. There has been little empirical evidence that fenced reserves can restore communities or ecological function over larger landscapes in ways that justify their large economic and sometimes social costs. Here we tested whether the exclusion of introduced predators restored mammal-sensitive habitat after 8 years within a mainland fenced reserve in southern New Zealand. We also asked whether the abundance of bird-dispersed fruiting trees and frugivorous birds was elevated immediately outside the reserve as compared with the broader landscape. We found that only saplings of fleshy-fruited tree species sensitive to browsing and seed predation by introduced mammals increased over time within the reserve. These mammal-sensitive trees were also more abundant in the surrounding unfenced landscape when close to the reserve, i.e. within 500 m. Our results suggested that mammal-sensitive trees were benefitting from increased fruit dispersal that was spilling over the fenced boundary as mammal-sensitive frugivores responded to predator control. Using repeated point count surveys at 278 unique sites throughout the broader region, we found that the native frugivore community that evolved in the absence of mammalian predators was a third more abundant within the reserve and immediately outside the fenced boundary than at sites 20 km away in the surrounding landscape. Non-endemic frugivores did not show the same spatial pattern. Our work provides among the first evidence that an intensively-managed wildlife reserve can measurably restore populations of threatened flora and fauna and disperse conservation benefits into wider landscapes.
dc.languageengen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectconservation planningen
dc.subjectforestsen
dc.subjectherbivoryen
dc.subjectinvasive speciesen
dc.subjectmeta-populationsen
dc.subjectprotected areasen
dc.subjectrestorationen
dc.subjectvegetation recoveryen
dc.titleFencing in nature? Predator exclusion restores habitat for native fauna and leads biodiversity to spill over into the wider landscapeen
dc.typeArticle
prism.endingPage126
prism.publicationDate2017en
prism.publicationNameBiological Conservationen
prism.startingPage119
prism.volume214en
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.12218
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-07-31en
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.biocon.2017.08.001en
rioxxterms.versionAM*
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-10-01en
dc.contributor.orcidTanentzap, Andrew [0000-0002-2883-1901]
dc.identifier.eissn1873-2917
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen
pubs.funder-project-idBritish Ecological Society (4492/5466)
cam.issuedOnline2017-08-12en
rioxxterms.freetoread.startdate2018-08-12


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International