Pragmatics and philosophy: In search of a paradigm

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>There is no doubt that pragmatic theory and philosophy of language are mutually relevant and intrinsically connected. The main question I address in this paper is how exactly they are interconnected in terms of (i) their respective objectives, (ii) explanans – explanandum relation, (iii) methods of enquiry, and (iv) drawing on associated disciplines. In the introductory part I attempt to bring some order into the diversity of use of such labels as philosophical logic, philosophical semantics, philosophical pragmatics, linguistic philosophy, or philosophy of linguistics, among others. In the following sections I focus on philosophical pragmatics as a branch of philosophy of language (pragmatics<jats:sub>PPL</jats:sub>) and the trends and theories it gave rise to, discussing them against the background of methodology of science and in particular paradigms and paradigm shifts as identified in natural science. In the main part of the paper I address the following questions: <jats:list id="j_ip-2018-0002_list_001_w2aab3b7b3b1b6b1aab1c14b1b3Aa" list-type="order"> <jats:list-item id="j_ip-2018-0002_li_001_w2aab3b7b3b1b6b1aab1c14b1b3aAa"> <jats:p>How is pragmatics<jats:sub>PPL</jats:sub> to be delimited?</jats:p> </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item id="j_ip-2018-0002_li_002_w2aab3b7b3b1b6b1aab1c14b1b3b1Aa"> <jats:p>How do pragmatic solutions to questions about meaning fare vis-à-vis syntactic solutions? Is there a pattern emerging?</jats:p> <jats:p>and, relatedly,</jats:p> </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item id="j_ip-2018-0002_li_004_w2aab3b7b3b1b6b1aab1c14b1b3b2Aa"> <jats:p>What are the future prospects for pragmatics<jats:sub>PPL</jats:sub> in theories of natural language meaning?</jats:p> </jats:list-item> </jats:list> </jats:p> <jats:p>I conclude with a discussion of the relation between pragmatics<jats:sub>PPL</jats:sub> and functionalism, observing that contextualism has to play a central role in functionalist pragmatics at the expense of minimalism and sententialism.</jats:p>