Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDowd, Kieran P
dc.contributor.authorSzeklicki, Robert
dc.contributor.authorMinetto, Marco A
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Marie H
dc.contributor.authorPolito, Angela
dc.contributor.authorGhigo, Ezio
dc.contributor.authorvan der Ploeg, Hidde
dc.contributor.authorEkelund, Ulf
dc.contributor.authorMaciaszek, Janusz
dc.contributor.authorStemplewski, Rafal
dc.contributor.authorTomczak, Maciej
dc.contributor.authorDonnelly, Alan E
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-09T07:02:23Z
dc.date.available2018-02-09T07:02:23Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-08
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2018 Feb 08;15(1):15
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/271833
dc.description.abstractAbstract The links between increased participation in Physical Activity (PA) and improvements in health are well established. As this body of evidence has grown, so too has the search for measures of PA with high levels of methodological effectiveness (i.e. validity, reliability and responsiveness to change). The aim of this “review of reviews” was to provide a comprehensive overview of the methodological effectiveness of currently employed measures of PA, to aid researchers in their selection of an appropriate tool. A total of 63 review articles were included in this review, and the original articles cited by these reviews were included in order to extract detailed information on methodological effectiveness. Self-report measures of PA have been most frequently examined for methodological effectiveness, with highly variable findings identified across a broad range of behaviours. The evidence-base for the methodological effectiveness of objective monitors, particularly accelerometers/activity monitors, is increasing, with lower levels of variability observed for validity and reliability when compared to subjective measures. Unfortunately, responsiveness to change across all measures and behaviours remains under-researched, with limited information available. Other criteria beyond methodological effectiveness often influence tool selection, including cost and feasibility. However, researchers must be aware of the methodological effectiveness of any measure selected for use when examining PA. Although no “perfect” tool for the examination of PA in adults exists, it is suggested that researchers aim to incorporate appropriate objective measures, specific to the behaviours of interests, when examining PA in free-living environments.
dc.titleA systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults: a DEDIPAC study
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.date.updated2018-02-09T07:02:20Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.18836
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s12966-017-0636-2


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record