Repository logo
 

Customised and Noncustomised Birth Weight Centiles and Prediction of Stillbirth and Infant Mortality and Morbidity: A Cohort Study of 979,912 Term Singleton Pregnancies in Scotland.

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Type

Article

Change log

Authors

Iliodromiti, Stamatina 
Mackay, Daniel F 
Smith, Gordon CS 
Pell, Jill P 
Sattar, Naveed 

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence to support the use of customised centile charts to identify those at risk of stillbirth and infant death at term. We sought to determine birth weight thresholds at which mortality and morbidity increased and the predictive ability of noncustomised (accounting for gestational age and sex) and partially customised centiles (additionally accounting for maternal height and parity) to identify fetuses at risk. METHODS: This is a population-based linkage study of 979,912 term singleton pregnancies in Scotland, United Kingdom, between 1992 and 2010. The main exposures were noncustomised and partially customised birth weight centiles. The primary outcomes were infant death, stillbirth, overall mortality (infant and stillbirth), Apgar score <7 at 5 min, and admission to the neonatal unit. Optimal thresholds that predicted outcomes for both non- and partially customised birth weight centiles were calculated. Prediction of mortality between non- and partially customised birth weight centiles was compared using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) and net reclassification index (NRI). FINDINGS: Birth weight ≤25th centile was associated with higher risk for all mortality and morbidity outcomes. For stillbirth, low Apgar score, and neonatal unit admission, risk also increased from the 85th centile. Similar patterns and magnitude of associations were observed for both non- and partially customised birth weight centiles. Partially customised birth weight centiles did not improve the discrimination of mortality (AUROC 0.61 [95%CI 0.60, 0.62]) compared with noncustomised birth weight centiles (AUROC 0.62 [95%CI 0.60, 0.63]) and slightly underperformed in reclassifying pregnancies to different risk categories for both fatal and non-fatal adverse outcomes (NRI -0.027 [95% CI -0.039, -0.016], p < 0.001). We were unable to fully customise centile charts because we lacked data on maternal weight and ethnicity. Additional analyses in an independent UK cohort (n = 10,515) suggested that lack of data on ethnicity in this population (in which national statistics show 98% are white British) and maternal weight would have misclassified ~15% of the large-for-gestation fetuses. CONCLUSIONS: At term, birth weight remains strongly associated with the risk of stillbirth and infant death and neonatal morbidity. Partial customisation does not improve prediction performance. Consideration of early term delivery or closer surveillance for those with a predicted birth weight ≤25th or ≥85th centile may reduce adverse outcomes. Replication of the analysis with fully customised centiles accounting for ethnicity is warranted.

Description

Keywords

adult, Apgar Score, birth weight, cohort studies, female, hospitalization, humans, infant, infant mortality, infant, newborn, intensive care units, neonatal, male, morbidity, pregnancy, Scotland, stillbirth, young adult

Journal Title

PLoS Medicine

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

1549-1277
1549-1676

Volume Title

14

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Sponsorship
SI is funded by a UK Medical Research Council skills development fellowship (MR/N015177/1). DAL works in a Unit that receives funding from the University of Bristol and the UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12013/5); she is a National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator (NF-SI-0611-10196). This work is also supported by the NIHR through the University of Bristol NIHR Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) and the University of Cambridge BRC. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.