Repository logo
 

Effect of Standard vs Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cerebral Blood Flow in Small Vessel Disease The PRESERVE Randomized Clinical Trial

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Change log

Authors

Croall, Iain 
Moynihan, Barry 
Khan, Usman 

Abstract

Importance: Blood pressure lowering is considered neuroprotective in patients with cerebral small vessel disease, however more “intensive” regimens may increase cerebral hypoperfusion. We examined the effect of intensive vs. standard blood pressure treatment on cerebral perfusion in severe small vessel disease patients. Objective: To determine whether intensive vs. standard blood pressure lowering over 3 months causes decreased cerebral perfusion. Design, Setting and Participants: This randomised, parallel, controlled, blinded-outcomes clinical trial took place in 2 English university medical centres. A central, online randomisation system (1:1 ratio) allocated grouping. 70 hypertensive patients with MRI confirmed symptomatic lacunar infarct and confluent white matter hyperintensities were recruited between 2012 and 2015, and randomised (36/34 in standard/intensive arms). Analysable data were available in 62 patients, 33/29 in the standard/intensive groups respectively, for intention to treat analysis. This experiment examines the 3 month follow-up period. Intervention: Patients were randomised to “standard” (systolic=130-140mmHg) or “intensive” (systolic=<125mmHg) blood pressure targets, to be achieved through medication regimen changes. Main Outcome and Measure: Cerebral perfusion was determined using arterial spin labelling; the primary end point was change in global perfusion between baseline and 3 months, compared between treatment groups by ANOVA. Linear regression compared change in perfusion against change in blood pressure. MR scan analysis was blinded to treatment arm. Results: Patients were 69.3 years old (mean) and 59.7% male. Mean(SD) systolic blood pressure reduced by 8(12) and 27(17)mmHg in the standard/intensive groups, respectively (p<0.001), with achieved pressures of 141(13) and 126(10) mmHg respectively. Change in global perfusion did not differ between treatment arms: standard, mean(SD) (ml/min/100g)= -0.5(9.4); intensive, 0.7(8.6), partial ETA2= 0.004, 95% CI= -3.6–5.8, p= 0.63. No differences were observed when analysis examined grey/white matter only, or was confined to those achieving target blood pressure. The number of adverse events did not differ between treatment groups (standard/intensive mean(SD)= .21(.65)/.32(.75), p=.44). Conclusions and Relevance: Intensive blood pressure lowering did not reduce cerebral perfusion in severe small vessel disease.

Description

Keywords

Aged, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Microvessels, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome

Journal Title

JAMA Neurology

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

2168-6149
2168-6157

Volume Title

Publisher

American Medical Association
Sponsorship
Stroke Association (TSA BHF 2010/01)
Medical Research Council (MR/N026896/1)
This study was funded by a joint Stroke Association/British Heart Foundation program grant (TSA BHF 2010/01). The study received additional support from the Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, which is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). Drs O’Brien, Ford, and Markus are supported by NIHR Senior Investigator awards. Drs O’Brien and Markus are also supported by the Cambridge University Hospitals NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre.