Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHulme, Michaelen
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-05T17:55:45Z
dc.date.available2018-04-05T17:55:45Z
dc.identifier.issn0892-6794
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/274615
dc.description.abstractChristopher J. Preston’s use of the doctrine of double effect to claim that hypothetical climate engineers might very well be less culpable for climate harms than those who continue to emit greenhouse gases is unpersuasive. His argument rests shakily on the ability to determine and quantify climate harms and to distinguish forensically between their causes. He is also largely silent about the distributional effects of these harms and their ethical and political ramifications.
dc.publisherCambridge University Press
dc.titleCalculating the Incalculable: Is SAI the Lesser of Two Evils?en
dc.typeArticle
prism.endingPage512
prism.issueIdentifier4en
prism.publicationNameEthics & International Affairsen
prism.startingPage507
prism.volume31en
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.21758
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-09-13en
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1017/S0892679417000491en
rioxxterms.versionAMen
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-09-13en
dc.contributor.orcidHulme, Michael [0000-0002-1273-7662]
dc.identifier.eissn1747-7093
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen
cam.issuedOnline2017-12-08en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record