Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKingsley, Danny
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-23T06:09:35Z
dc.date.available2018-05-23T06:09:35Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-24
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/276106
dc.description.abstractIn 1942, Robert Merton wrote that “Incipient and actual attacks upon the integrity of science” meant that science needed to “restate its objectives, seek out its rationale”. Some 77 years later we are similarly in an environment where “the people of this country have had enough of experts". It is essential that science is able to withstand rigorous scrutiny to avoid being dismissed, pilloried or ignored. Transparency and reproducibility in the scientific process is a mechanism to meet this challenge and good research data management is a fundamental factor in this.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectOpen Researchen
dc.subjectreproducibilityen
dc.subjectresearch data managementen
dc.titleThe ‘end of the expert’: why science needs to be above criticismen
dc.title.alternativePresentation to "Towards cultural change in data management - data stewardship in practice", held at TU Delften
dc.typePresentationen
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.23388


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 4.0 International