Public responses to proposals for a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages: A thematic analysis of online reader comments posted on major UK news websites.
Publication Date
2017-01Journal Title
PloS one
ISSN
1932-6203
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Volume
12
Issue
11
Pages
e0186750
Language
eng
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Physical Medium
Electronic-eCollection
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Thomas-Meyer, M., Mytton, O., & Adams, J. (2017). Public responses to proposals for a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages: A thematic analysis of online reader comments posted on major UK news websites.. PloS one, 12 (11), e0186750. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186750
Abstract
Background
Regular consumption of sugar sweetened beverages (SSBs) is associated with weight gain, type 2 diabetes, and dental caries. The UK will introduce a levy on the manufacturers of SSBs in 2018. Details will be negotiated over the next two years. How the UK public views SSB taxes is likely to be an important determinant of the content and success of the final policy. We aimed to capture the views, ideas and concerns of commenters on major UK news websites on SSB taxes.
Methods and findings
We conducted a qualitative analysis of reader comments to online news coverage of one proposal for an SSB tax in the UK.
1645 comments on four articles were included. Three underpinning themes influenced support or opposition to the tax: the balance between individual responsibility and autonomy, and population need; mistrust of the intention of the proposed tax and those promoting it; and variations in the perceived complexity of unhealthy diets and obesity associated with variations in what are considered appropriate interventions. Arguments under each theme were used to justify both support and opposition in different cases.
Conclusions
As the final form of the UK SSB tax is negotiated, effort should be made to address the concerns we identified. Our results suggests these efforts could usefully focus on emphasising the social and environmental determinants of diet and obesity, reinforcing the benefits of the tax to the NHS, and pitching the tax as playing into a variety of different conceptualisations of obesity.
Keywords
Humans, Obesity, Sweetening Agents, Diet, Trust, Public Opinion, Beverages, Internet, Taxes, Newspapers as Topic, United Kingdom, Sugars
Sponsorship
The work was undertaken by the Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), a UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence. Funding from the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, the National Institute for Health Research, and the Wellcome Trust, under the auspices of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration, is gratefully acknowledged. The CEDAR grant is administered by the Medical Research Council (www.mrc.ac.uk), grant number MR/K023187/1. The funders played no role in the design of the study, data collect or interpretation, manuscript preparation or the decision to publish.
Funder references
MRC (MR/K023187/1)
ESRC (ES/G007462/1)
Wellcome Trust (087636/Z/08/Z)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186750
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/276409
Recommended or similar items
The following licence files are associated with this item: