Diagnostic evaluation of magnetization transfer and diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer detection in a re-biopsy population.
View / Open Files
Authors
Priest, Andrew N
Lawrence, Edward M
Patterson, Andrew
Koo, Brendan C
Patterson, Ilse
Doble, Andrew
Kastner, Christof
Publication Date
2018-08Journal Title
European radiology
ISSN
0938-7994
Publisher
Springer Nature
Volume
28
Issue
8
Pages
3141-3150
Language
eng
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Physical Medium
Print-Electronic
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Barrett, T., McLean, M., Priest, A. N., Lawrence, E. M., Patterson, A., Koo, B. C., Patterson, I., et al. (2018). Diagnostic evaluation of magnetization transfer and diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer detection in a re-biopsy population.. European radiology, 28 (8), 3141-3150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5169-1
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and magnetization transfer imaging (MTI) compared to standard MRI for prostate cancer assessment in a re-biopsy population.
Methods: Thirty-patients underwent 3T-MRI including DKI (Kapp and Dapp) was acquired with b-values of 150/450/800/1150/1500 s/mm2 and MTI performed with and without MT saturation. Patients underwent transperineal biopsy on prospectively-defined MRI-targets. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses assessed the parameters and Wilcoxon-signed ranked test assessed relationships between metrics.
Results: 20 patients had ≥1 core positive for cancer in a total of 26 MRI-targets (Gleason 3+3 in 8, 3+4 in 12, ≥4+3 in 6); 13 peripheral (PZ) and 13 transition zone (TZ). Apparent diffusion-coefficient (ADC) and Dapp were significantly lower, and Kapp and MT ratio (MTR) significantly higher in tumour versus benign PZ/TZ (all p≤0.005); ROC values 0.767-1.000. Normal TZ had lower ADC and Dapp and higher Kapp and MTR compared to normal PZ. MTR showed moderate correlation to Kapp (r=0.570) and Dapp (r=-0.537) in normal tissue but a poor correlation in tumours. None of the measured parameters separated low-grade (Gleason 3+3) from higher-grade (≥3+4) disease for either PZ (p= 0.414-0.825) or TZ (p= 0.148-0.825).
Conclusion: ADC, Dapp, Kapp and MTR all distinguished benign tissue from tumour, but none reliably differentiated low from high-grade disease.
Keywords
Humans, Prostatic Neoplasms, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Retreatment, Prospective Studies, ROC Curve, Aged, Middle Aged, Male, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Image-Guided Biopsy
Sponsorship
Cancer Research UK (16628)
PROSTATE CANCER UK (PA14-012)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5169-1
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/276497
Recommended or similar items
The following licence files are associated with this item: