Not-so-magic Bullets: Searching for Better Policies to Govern Drug Discovery
View / Open Files
Authors
Gürel, Alexandra
Publication Date
2016-01-01Journal Title
CUSPE Communications
Publisher
CUSPE
Language
English
Type
Working Paper
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Gürel, A. (2016). Not-so-magic Bullets: Searching for Better Policies to Govern Drug Discovery. CUSPE Communications https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.25626
Abstract
In his upcoming book, Strange Pill: Evidence, Values, and Medical Nihilism, philosopher of Jacob Stegenga charts a history of the term “magic bullet”: a drug that is both specific and effective, curing the patient without side effects. Stegenga argues that the early 20th century was a “golden age” for magic bullets, with the discovery of drugs like penicillin and insulin, and that late 20th/early 21st century medicine has not been able to deliver drugs that are nearly as effective. I propose, by interviewing Stegenga, to outline why recently discovered drugs tend to have tiny effect sizes and bad side effects (and therefore a poor cost/benefit ratio.) I will then outline proposals for how the modern medical research agenda can be restructured so that its products more closely resemble “magic bullets,” an outcome that would save the NHS money and improve the patient experience.
Identifiers
This record's DOI: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.25626
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/278278
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.