The sociology of knowledge as postphilosophical epistemology: Out of IR's "socially constructed" idealism
View / Open Files
Authors
Publication Date
2018-03Journal Title
International Studies Review
ISSN
1521-9488
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
3-29
Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Hamati-Ataya, I. (2018). The sociology of knowledge as postphilosophical epistemology: Out of IR's "socially constructed" idealism. International Studies Review, 20 (1), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/vix028
Abstract
This paper first aims to draw attention to, and diagnose, the failure of IR’s ‘sociological turn’ to extend the domain of sociological reason into the philosophical turf of epistemology and thereby fulfill the full promises of the ‘post-positivist turn’. Its second purpose is to revive and deploy the radical version of the sociology of knowledge that can achieve an autonomous reconstruction of epistemology suited to a reflexive, post-Kantian consciousness. The diagnosis begins by tracing the erasure of the radical sociological position in the connected evolutions of Sociology and IR. It shows that the derailing of the ‘sociological revolution’ was paradoxically mediated by the consolidation of social constructionism and science studies, reproduced in IR through their counterparts in the ‘sociological turn’: Constructivism and the sociology of IR. In these otherwise reflexive developments the progression of sociological reason was halted by a self-imposed limitation on the extension of sociological analysis to all domains of thought, and the endorsement of an idealist and institutionalist ontology of ‘the social’. A reformulation of the forgotten, radical sociological position clarifies the implications for IR of a transition to a post-philosophical theory of knowledge, and delineates an empirical research agenda for such a reconstruction of epistemology driven by a sociology of knowledge of a ‘revolutionary’ persuasion. Exploring the centrality of social practice in the social determination of knowledge, the paper argues that, and shows how, a properly reflexive reconstruction of epistemology is best achieved by deploying the sociology of knowledge in two complementary materialist directions: a sociology of everyday social practices that illuminates our epistemic immersion in the ‘carpentered environments’ of the socio-natural order, and a sociology of craft that objectivates the social constitution of the skholè as a mode of existential boundedness by addressing scholarly thought as differentiated social labor.
Sponsorship
FP7 MSCA grant #322146
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/vix028
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/279520
Rights
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Licence URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.