Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJun, Gyuchan T
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Zoe
dc.contributor.authorEldabi, Tillal
dc.contributor.authorHarper, Paul
dc.contributor.authorNaseer, Aisha
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Brijesh
dc.contributor.authorClarkson, John
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-08T06:34:25Z
dc.date.available2018-09-08T06:34:25Z
dc.date.issued2011-05-19
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/279911
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: There is an increasing recognition that modelling and simulation can assist in the process of designing health care policies, strategies and operations. However, the current use is limited and answers to questions such as what methods to use and when remain somewhat underdeveloped. AIM: The aim of this study is to provide a mechanism for decision makers in health services planning and management to compare a broad range of modelling and simulation methods so that they can better select and use them or better commission relevant modelling and simulation work. METHODS: This paper proposes a modelling and simulation method comparison and selection tool developed from a comprehensive literature review, the research team's extensive expertise and inputs from potential users. Twenty-eight different methods were identified, characterised by their relevance to different application areas, project life cycle stages, types of output and levels of insight, and four input resources required (time, money, knowledge and data). RESULTS: The characterisation is presented in matrix forms to allow quick comparison and selection. This paper also highlights significant knowledge gaps in the existing literature when assessing the applicability of particular approaches to health services management, where modelling and simulation skills are scarce let alone money and time. CONCLUSIONS: A modelling and simulation method comparison and selection tool is developed to assist with the selection of methods appropriate to supporting specific decision making processes. In particular it addresses the issue of which method is most appropriate to which specific health services management problem, what the user might expect to be obtained from the method, and what is required to use the method. In summary, we believe the tool adds value to the scarce existing literature on methods comparison and selection.
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectDecision Making
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectKnowledge
dc.subjectModels, Organizational
dc.subjectQualitative Research
dc.subjectEducation
dc.subjectComputer Simulation
dc.subjectHealth Services
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectHealth Services Accessibility
dc.subjectEvidence-Based Practice
dc.subjectUnited Kingdom
dc.titleDevelopment of modelling method selection tool for health services management: from problem structuring methods to modelling and simulation methods.
dc.typeArticle
prism.publicationDate2011
prism.publicationNameBMC Health Serv Res
prism.startingPage108
prism.volume11
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.27279
dcterms.dateAccepted2011-05-19
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/1472-6963-11-108
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2011-05-19
dc.contributor.orcidClarkson, John [0000-0001-8018-7706]
dc.identifier.eissn1472-6963
dc.publisher.urlhttp://www.bmj.com/content/341/bmj.c4078/reply#bmj_el_240936
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
pubs.funder-project-idEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/E019900/1)
cam.issuedOnline2011-05-19


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)