A transdiagnostic dimensional approach towards a neuropsychological assessment for addiction: an international Delphi consensus study.
Authors
Oldenhof, Erin
Belin, David
Bowden-Jones, Henrietta
Chamberlain, Samuel R
Connor, Jason
Dom, Geert
Dannon, Pinhas
Duka, Theodora
Fernandez-Serrano, Maria Jose
Field, Matt
Franken, Ingmar
Goldstein, Rita Z
Gonzalez, Raul
Lee, Rico SC
Lorenzetti, Valentina
Potenza, Marc N
Segrave, Rebecca
van den Brink, Wim
van Holst, Ruth J
Voon, Valerie
Fontenelle, Leonardo F
Publication Date
2019-06Journal Title
Addiction
ISSN
0965-2140
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
114
Issue
6
Pages
1095-1109
Language
eng
Type
Article
Physical Medium
Print-Electronic
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Yücel, M., Oldenhof, E., Ahmed, S. H., Belin, D., Billieux, J., Bowden-Jones, H., Carter, A., et al. (2019). A transdiagnostic dimensional approach towards a neuropsychological assessment for addiction: an international Delphi consensus study.. Addiction, 114 (6), 1095-1109. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14424
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The US National Institutes of Mental Health Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) seek to stimulate research into biologically validated neuropsychological dimensions across mental illness symptoms and diagnoses. The RDoC framework comprises 39 functional constructs designed to be revised and refined, with the overall goal of improving diagnostic validity and treatments. This study aimed to reach a consensus among experts in the addiction field on the 'primary' RDoC constructs most relevant to substance and behavioural addictions. METHODS: Forty-four addiction experts were recruited from Australia, Asia, Europe and the Americas. The Delphi technique was used to determine a consensus as to the degree of importance of each construct in understanding the essential dimensions underpinning addictive behaviours. Expert opinions were canvassed online over three rounds (97% completion rate), with each consecutive round offering feedback for experts to review their opinions. RESULTS: Seven constructs were endorsed by ≥ 80% of experts as 'primary' to the understanding of addictive behaviour: five from the Positive Valence System (reward valuation, expectancy, action selection, reward learning, habit); one from the Cognitive Control System (response selection/inhibition); and one expert-initiated construct (compulsivity). These constructs were rated to be related differentially to stages of the addiction cycle, with some linked more closely to addiction onset and others more to chronicity. Experts agreed that these neuropsychological dimensions apply across a range of addictions. CONCLUSIONS: The study offers a novel and neuropsychologically informed theoretical framework, as well as a cogent step forward to test transdiagnostic concepts in addiction research, with direct implications for assessment, diagnosis, staging of disorder, and treatment.
Keywords
Addiction, RDoC, assessment, cognition, compulsions, decision-making, habit, reward, transdiagnostic, Asia, Australia, Behavior, Addictive, Compulsive Behavior, Decision Making, Delphi Technique, Europe, Habits, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Learning, National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.), North America, Reward, South America, Substance-Related Disorders, United States
Sponsorship
Medical research Council
Leverhulme Trust
Funder references
Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2016-117)
Medical Research Council (MR/N02530X/1)
Wellcome Trust (110049/Z/15/Z)
Medical Research Council (MR/P008747/1)
Embargo Lift Date
2100-01-01
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14424
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/279925
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk