Acceptability, Accuracy, and Safety of Disposable Transnasal Capsule Endoscopy for Barrett's Esophagus Screening.
View / Open Files
Authors
Sami, Sarmed S
Iyer, Prasad G
Pophali, Prachi
Halland, Magnus
di Pietro, Massimiliano
Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo, Jacobo
White, Jonathan R
Johnson, Michele
Guha, Indra Neil
Fitzgerald, Rebecca C
Ragunath, Krish
Publication Date
2019-03Journal Title
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
ISSN
1542-3565
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
638-646.e1
Language
eng
Type
Article
Physical Medium
Print-Electronic
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Sami, S. S., Iyer, P. G., Pophali, P., Halland, M., di Pietro, M., Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo, J., White, J. R., et al. (2019). Acceptability, Accuracy, and Safety of Disposable Transnasal Capsule Endoscopy for Barrett's Esophagus Screening.. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 17 (4), 638-646.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.019
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Screening for Barrett's esophagus (BE) with conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy (C-EGD) is expensive. We assessed the performance of a clinic-based, single use transnasal capsule endoscope (EG Scan II) for the detection of BE, compared to C-EGD as the reference standard. METHODS: We performed a prospective multicenter cohort study of patients with and without BE recruited from 3 referral centers (1 in the United States and 2 in the United Kingdom). Of 200 consenting participants, 178 (89%) completed both procedures (11% failed EG Scan due to the inability to intubate the nasopharynx). The mean age of participants was 57.9 years and 67% were male. The prevalence of BE was 53%. All subjects underwent the 2 procedures on the same day, performed by blinded endoscopists. Patients completed preference and validated tolerability (10-point visual analogue scale [VAS]) questionnaires within 14 days of the procedures. RESULTS: A higher proportion of patients preferred the EG Scan (54.2%) vs the C-EGD (16.7%) (P < .001) and the EG Scan had a higher VAS score (7.2) vs the C-EGD (6.4) (P = .0004). No serious adverse events occurred. The EG Scan identified any length BE with a sensitivity value of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83-0.96) and a specificity value of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.82-0.96). The EG Scan identified long segment BE with a sensitivity value of 0.95 and short segment BE with a sensitivity values of 0.87. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study, we found the EG Scan to be safe and to detect BE with higher than 90% sensitivity and specificity. A higher proportion of patients preferred the EG Scan to C-EGD. This device might be used as a clinic-based tool to screen populations at risk for BE. ISRCTN registry identifier: 70595405; ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT02066233.
Keywords
Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Imaging, Office, Portable, Reflux, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Barrett Esophagus, Capsule Endoscopy, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Safety, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, United Kingdom, United States
Sponsorship
Cancer Research UK (C14478/A12088)
MRC (unknown)
Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12022/2)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.019
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/279943
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Licence URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk