Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRipoll Gallardo, Alba
dc.contributor.authorPacelli, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorAlesina, Marta
dc.contributor.authorSerrone, Dario
dc.contributor.authorIacutone, Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorFaggiano, Fabrizio
dc.contributor.authorDella Corte, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorAllara, Elias
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-11T17:31:40Z
dc.date.available2018-09-11T17:31:40Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-01
dc.identifier.issn0300-5771
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/280181
dc.description.abstractBackground: Accurate monitoring of population health is essential to ensure proper recovery after earthquakes. We aimed to summarize the findings and features of post-earthquake epidemiological studies conducted in high-income countries and to prompt the development of future surveillance plans. Methods: Medline, Scopus and six sources of grey literature were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria were: observational study conducted in high-income countries with at least one comparison group of unexposed participants, and measurement of health outcomes at least 1 month after the earthquake. Results: A total of 52 articles were included, assessing the effects of 13 earthquakes that occurred in eight countries. Most studies: had a time-series (33%) or cross-sectional (29%) design; included temporal comparison groups (63%); used routine data (58%); and focused on patient subgroups rather than the whole population (65%). Individuals exposed to earthquakes had: 2% higher all-cause mortality rates [95% confidence interval (CI), 1% to 3%]; 36% (95% CI, 19% to 57%) and 37% (95% CI, 29% to 46%) greater mortality rates from myocardial infarction and stroke, respectively; and 0.16 higher mean percent points of glycated haemoglobin (95% CI, 0.07% to 0.25% points). There was no evidence of earthquake effects for blood pressure, body mass index or lipid biomarkers. Conclusions: A more regular and coordinated use of large and routinely collected datasets would benefit post-earthquake epidemiological surveillance. Whenever possible, a cohort design with geographical and temporal comparison groups should be used, and both communicable and non-communicable diseases should be assessed. Post-earthquake epidemiological surveillance should also capture the impact of seismic events on the access to and use of health care services.
dc.format.mediumPrint
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMortality
dc.subjectNatural Disasters
dc.subjectDeveloped Countries
dc.subjectEarthquakes
dc.subjectEpidemiological Monitoring
dc.subjectGlycated Hemoglobin A
dc.titleMedium- and long-term health effects of earthquakes in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
dc.typeArticle
prism.endingPage1332
prism.issueIdentifier4
prism.publicationDate2018
prism.publicationNameInt J Epidemiol
prism.startingPage1317
prism.volume47
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.27548
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-06-01
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1093/ije/dyy130
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-08
dc.contributor.orcidAllara, Elias [0000-0002-1634-8330]
dc.identifier.eissn1464-3685
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
cam.issuedOnline2018-07-19
rioxxterms.freetoread.startdate2019-07-19


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record