Repository logo
 

Prevalence and costs of treating uncomplicated stage 1 hypertension in primary care: a cross-sectional analysis.

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Type

Article

Change log

Authors

Sheppard, James P 
Fletcher, Kate 
McManus, Richard J 

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment for uncomplicated stage 1 hypertension is recommended in most international guidelines but there is little evidence to indicate that therapy is beneficial. AIM: To estimate the prevalence of this condition in an untreated population and the potential costs of initiating therapy in such patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study of anonymised patient records in 19 general practices in the West Midlands, UK. METHOD: Data relating to patient demographics, existing cardiovascular disease (CVD), and risk factors (blood pressure and cholesterol) were extracted from patient records. Patients with a blood pressure of 140/90-159/99 mmHg, no CVD, and <20% 10-year cardiovascular risk were classified as having uncomplicated stage 1 hypertension. Missing data were imputed. The prevalence of untreated, uncomplicated stage 1 hypertension was estimated using descriptive statistics and extrapolated using national data. The cost of achieving blood pressure control in this population was examined in a cost-impact analysis using published costs from previous studies. RESULTS: Of the 34 975 patients (aged 40-74 years) in this study, untreated, uncomplicated stage 1 hypertension was present in 2867 individuals (8.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.9 to 8.5). This is equivalent to 1 892 519 patients in England and Wales, for whom the additional cost of controlling blood pressure, according to guidelines, was estimated at £106-229 million per annum, depending on the health professional delivering care. CONCLUSION: Untreated, uncomplicated stage 1 hypertension is relatively common, affecting 1 in 12 patients aged 40-74 years in primary care. Current international guidelines and pay-for-performance targets, if followed, will incur significant costs for a patient benefit that is debatable.

Description

Keywords

antihypertensive agents, cardiovascular disease risk, guidelines, primary prevention, Adult, Aged, Antihypertensive Agents, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Cross-Sectional Studies, England, Female, General Practice, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Prevalence, Primary Health Care, Primary Prevention

Journal Title

Br J Gen Pract

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

0960-1643
1478-5242

Volume Title

64

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners
Sponsorship
This work forms part of a larger programme on stroke prevention in primary care supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (RP-PG-0606-1153). James P Sheppard holds a Medical Research Council Strategic Skills PostDoctoral Fellowship. Richard J McManus holds an NIHR Professorship. The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, NIHR, or the Department of Health.