Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSinnott, Carolen
dc.contributor.authorRacine, Emmyen
dc.contributor.authorHurley, Carolineen
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Aoifeen
dc.contributor.authorKearney, Patriciaen
dc.contributor.authorSmithson, Henryen
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-17T14:59:51Z
dc.date.available2018-09-17T14:59:51Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-12en
dc.identifier.issn2515-4826
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/280310
dc.description.abstractBackground: While there is an increasing consensus that clinical trial results should be shared with trial participants, there is a lack of evidence on the most appropriate methods. The aim of this study is to use a patient and public involvement (PPI) approach to identify, develop and evaluate a patient-preferred method of receiving results of the Thyroid Hormone Replacement for Subclinical Hypo-Thyroidism Trial (TRUST). Methods: This is a mixed methods study with three consecutive phases. Phase 1 iteratively developed a patient-preferred result method using semi-structured focus groups and a consensus-orientated-decision model, a PPI group to refine the method and adult literacy review for plain English assessment. Phase 2 was a single-blind parallel group trial. Irish TRUST participants were randomised to the intervention (patient-preferred method) and control group (standard method developed by lead study site). Phase 3 used a patient understanding questionnaire to compare patient understanding of results between the two methods. Results: Patients want to receive results of clinical trials, with qualitative findings indicating three key themes including ‘acknowledgement of individual contribution’, ‘contributing for a collective benefit’ and ‘receiving accessible and easy to understand results’. Building on these findings, a patient-preferred method of receiving results was developed as described above. TRUST participants (n=101) were randomised to the intervention. The questionnaire response rate was 74% for the intervention group and 62% for the control group. There were no differences in patient understanding between the two methods. Conclusions: We have demonstrated that it is feasible to conduct PPI with regard to the dissemination of results. The study identified and developed a patient-preferred method of receiving clinical trial results for older adults over 65 years. Although, in this study PPI did not influence patients’ final understanding of results, it provides a record of the process of conducting PPI within the clinical trial setting.
dc.publisherF1000 Research
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleParticipants’ perspectives and preferences on clinical trial result dissemination: The TRUST Thyroid Trial experienceen
dc.typeArticle
prism.number14en
prism.publicationDate2018en
prism.publicationNameHRB Open Researchen
prism.volume1en
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.25423
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-04-09en
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.12688/hrbopenres.12817.1en
rioxxterms.versionVoR*
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-04-12en
dc.contributor.orcidSinnott, Carol [0000-0002-8620-7461]
dc.identifier.eissn2515-4826
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen
cam.issuedOnline2018-04-12en


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 4.0 International