Four system boundaries for carbon accounts
View / Open Files
Authors
Liu, Zhu
Feng, Kuishuang
Hubacek, Klaus
Liang, Sai
Anadon, Laura Diaz
Zhang, Chao
Guan, Dabo
Publication Date
2015Journal Title
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
ISSN
0304-3800
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
318
Pages
118-125
Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Liu, Z., Feng, K., Hubacek, K., Liang, S., Anadon, L. D., Zhang, C., & Guan, D. (2015). Four system boundaries for carbon accounts. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 318 118-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.02.001
Abstract
Knowing the carbon emission baseline of a region is a precondition for any mitigation effort, but the baselines are highly dependent on the system boundaries for which they are calculated. On the basis of sectoral energy statistics and a nested provincial and global multi-regional input–output model, we calculate and compare four different system boundaries for China's 30 provinces and major cities. The results demonstrate significant differences in the level of emissions for the different system boundaries. Moreover, the associated emissions with each system boundary varies with the regional development level, i.e. richer areas outsource more emissions to other areas, or in other words boundary 4 emissions are higher than boundary 1 emissions for rich areas and vice versa for poor areas. Given these significant differences it is important to be aware of the implications the choice of an accounting system might have on outcomes.
Keywords
Carbon emissions, Carbon footprint, Consumption-based emission, Multi-regional input-output analysis, Embodied emissions, China
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.02.001
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/280422
Rights
Licence:
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk