ANTITRUST DAMAGES IN EU LAW: THE INTERFACE OF MULTIFARIOUS HARMONISATION AND NATIONAL PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY
dc.contributor.author | Albors-Llorens, A | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-09-20T12:03:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-09-20T12:03:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-07-31 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0083-4041 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/280453 | |
dc.description.abstract | The adoption of Directive 2014/104/EU on actions for damages for infringements of the competition rules has marked the beginning of a new era in the field of the private enforcement of the EU Competition rules. The arduous legislative journey leading to the adoption of the Directive, the specific aspects pertaining to the exercise of damages actions covered by it and its attempt to establish an effective coordination between the systems of public and private enforcement have already received intense attention by antitrust scholars. However, this contribution focuses on the study of the Directive’s significance as a novel legal instrument in both the fields of EU Competition law and EU law in general. | |
dc.title | ANTITRUST DAMAGES IN EU LAW: THE INTERFACE OF MULTIFARIOUS HARMONISATION AND NATIONAL PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY | |
dc.type | Article | |
prism.endingPage | 151 | |
prism.publicationDate | 2018 | |
prism.publicationName | University of Queensland Law Journal | |
prism.startingPage | 139 | |
prism.volume | 37 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.17863/CAM.27824 | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2018-06-04 | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2018-07-31 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | |
rioxxterms.freetoread.startdate | 2019-07-31 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Cambridge University Research Outputs
Research outputs of the University of Cambridge