Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStojic, Lovorka
dc.contributor.authorLun, Aaron
dc.contributor.authorMangei, Jasmin
dc.contributor.authorMascalchi, Patrice
dc.contributor.authorQuarantotti, Valentina
dc.contributor.authorBarr, Alexis
dc.contributor.authorBakal, Chris
dc.contributor.authorMarioni, John
dc.contributor.authorGergely, Fanni
dc.contributor.authorOdom, Duncan
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-20T12:07:53Z
dc.date.available2018-09-20T12:07:53Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-15
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/280572
dc.description.abstract<h4>ABSTRACT</h4> Loss-of-function (LOF) methods, such as RNA interference (RNAi), antisense oligonucleotides or CRISPR-based genome editing, provide unparalleled power for studying the biological function of genes of interest. When coupled with transcriptomic analyses, LOF methods allow researchers to dissect networks of transcriptional regulation. However, a major concern is nonspecific targeting, which involves depletion of transcripts other than those intended. The off-target effects of each of these common LOF methods have yet to be compared at the whole-transcriptome level. Here, we systematically and experimentally compared non-specific activity of RNAi, antisense oligonucleotides and CRISPR interference (CRISPRi). All three methods yielded non-negligible offtarget effects in gene expression, with CRISPRi exhibiting clonal variation in the transcriptional profile. As an illustrative example, we evaluated the performance of each method for deciphering the role of a long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) with unknown function. Although all LOF methods reduced expression of the candidate lncRNA, each method yielded different sets of differentially expressed genes upon knockdown as well as a different cellular phenotype. Therefore, to definitively confirm the functional role of a transcriptional regulator, we recommend the simultaneous use of at least two different LOF methods and the inclusion of multiple, specifically designed negative controls.
dc.publisherCold Spring Harbor Laboratory
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleSpecificity of RNAi, LNA and CRISPRi as loss-of-function methods in transcriptional analysis
dc.typeArticle
prism.publicationDate2017
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.27940
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1101/234930
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-12-15
dc.contributor.orcidStojic, Lovorka [0000-0001-6691-3396]
dc.contributor.orcidLun, Aaron [0000-0002-3564-4813]
dc.contributor.orcidQuarantotti, Valentina [0000-0003-4544-9939]
dc.contributor.orcidBarr, Alexis [0000-0002-6684-8114]
dc.contributor.orcidBakal, Chris [0000-0002-0413-6744]
dc.contributor.orcidMarioni, John [0000-0001-9092-0852]
dc.contributor.orcidGergely, Fanni [0000-0002-2441-8095]
dc.contributor.orcidOdom, Duncan [0000-0001-6201-5599]
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
pubs.funder-project-idCancer Research UK (CB4180)
pubs.funder-project-idCancer Research UK (C14303/A17197)
pubs.funder-project-idCancer Research UK (20412)
pubs.funder-project-idWellcome Trust (202878/Z/16/Z)
pubs.funder-project-idEuropean Research Council (615584)


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 4.0 International