National implementation of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection - recommendations from a UK consensus meeting.
View / Open Files
Authors
Brizmohun Appayya, Mrishta
Adshead, Jim
Ahmed, Hashim U
Allen, Clare
Bainbridge, Alan
Barrett, Tristan
Giganti, Francesco
Graham, John
Haslam, Phil
Johnston, Edward W
Kastner, Christof
Kirkham, Alexander PS
Lipton, Alexandra
McNeill, Alan
Moniz, Larissa
Moore, Caroline M
Nabi, Ghulam
Padhani, Anwar R
Parker, Chris
Patel, Amit
Pursey, Jacqueline
Richenberg, Jonathan
Staffurth, John
van der Meulen, Jan
Walls, Darren
Publication Date
2018-07Journal Title
BJU Int
ISSN
1464-4096
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
122
Issue
1
Pages
13-25
Language
eng
Type
Article
Physical Medium
Print-Electronic
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Brizmohun Appayya, M., Adshead, J., Ahmed, H. U., Allen, C., Bainbridge, A., Barrett, T., Giganti, F., et al. (2018). National implementation of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection - recommendations from a UK consensus meeting.. BJU Int, 122 (1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14361
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To identify areas of agreement and disagreement in the implementation of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate in the diagnostic pathway. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen UK experts in prostate mpMRI and/or prostate cancer management across the UK (involving nine NHS centres to provide for geographical spread) participated in a consensus meeting following the Research and Development Corporation and University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA-RAND) Appropriateness Method, and were moderated by an independent chair. The experts considered 354 items pertaining to who can request an mpMRI, prostate mpMRI protocol, reporting guidelines, training, quality assurance (QA) and patient management based on mpMRI levels of suspicion for cancer. Each item was rated for agreement on a 9-point scale. A panel median score of ≥7 constituted 'agreement' for an item; for an item to reach 'consensus', a panel majority scoring was required. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on 59% of items (208/354); these were used to provide recommendations for the implementation of prostate mpMRI in the UK. Key findings include prostate mpMRI requests should be made in consultation with the urological team; mpMRI scanners should undergo QA checks to guarantee consistently high diagnostic quality scans; scans should only be reported by trained and experienced radiologists to ensure that men with unsuspicious prostate mpMRI might consider avoiding an immediate biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Our consensus statements demonstrate a set of criteria that are required for the practical dissemination of consistently high-quality prostate mpMRI as a diagnostic test before biopsy in men at risk.
Keywords
consensus methods, multi-parametric MRI, prostate cancer, recommendations, Biopsy, Needle, Contrast Media, Early Detection of Cancer, Education, Medical, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Prostate, Prostate-Specific Antigen, Prostatic Neoplasms, Quality of Health Care, Radiologists, Referral and Consultation, Research Design, Tumor Burden
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14361
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/280578
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk