Menopausal hormone use and ovarian cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis of 52 epidemiological studies.
View / Open Files
Authors
Collaborative Group On Epidemiological Studies Of Ovarian Cancer
Beral, V
Gaitskell, K
Hermon, C
Moser, K
Reeves, G
Peto, R
Publication Date
2015-05-09Journal Title
Lancet
ISSN
0140-6736
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
385
Issue
9980
Pages
1835-1842
Language
eng
Type
Article
Physical Medium
Print-Electronic
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Collaborative Group On Epidemiological Studies Of Ovarian Cancer, Beral, V., Gaitskell, K., Hermon, C., Moser, K., Reeves, G., & Peto, R. (2015). Menopausal hormone use and ovarian cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis of 52 epidemiological studies.. Lancet, 385 (9980), 1835-1842. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61687-1
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Half the epidemiological studies with information about menopausal hormone therapy and ovarian cancer risk remain unpublished, and some retrospective studies could have been biased by selective participation or recall. We aimed to assess with minimal bias the effects of hormone therapy on ovarian cancer risk. METHODS: Individual participant datasets from 52 epidemiological studies were analysed centrally. The principal analyses involved the prospective studies (with last hormone therapy use extrapolated forwards for up to 4 years). Sensitivity analyses included the retrospective studies. Adjusted Poisson regressions yielded relative risks (RRs) versus never-use. FINDINGS: During prospective follow-up, 12 110 postmenopausal women, 55% (6601) of whom had used hormone therapy, developed ovarian cancer. Among women last recorded as current users, risk was increased even with <5 years of use (RR 1·43, 95% CI 1·31-1·56; p<0·0001). Combining current-or-recent use (any duration, but stopped <5 years before diagnosis) resulted in an RR of 1·37 (95% CI 1·29-1·46; p<0·0001); this risk was similar in European and American prospective studies and for oestrogen-only and oestrogen-progestagen preparations, but differed across the four main tumour types (heterogeneity p<0·0001), being definitely increased only for the two most common types, serous (RR 1·53, 95% CI 1·40-1·66; p<0·0001) and endometrioid (1·42, 1·20-1·67; p<0·0001). Risk declined the longer ago use had ceased, although about 10 years after stopping long-duration hormone therapy use there was still an excess of serous or endometrioid tumours (RR 1·25, 95% CI 1·07-1·46, p=0·005). INTERPRETATION: The increased risk may well be largely or wholly causal; if it is, women who use hormone therapy for 5 years from around age 50 years have about one extra ovarian cancer per 1000 users and, if its prognosis is typical, about one extra ovarian cancer death per 1700 users. FUNDING: Medical Research Council, Cancer Research UK.
Keywords
Drug Administration Schedule, Estrogen Replacement Therapy, Female, Humans, Incidence, Middle Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms, Postmenopause, Risk Assessment
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61687-1
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/280622
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk