Social relationships and healthful dietary behaviour: evidence from over-50s in the EPIC cohort, UK.
View / Open Files
Authors
Conklin, Annalijn I
Forouhi, Nita G
Surtees, Paul
Wareham, Nicholas J
Publication Date
2014-01Journal Title
Soc Sci Med
ISSN
0277-9536
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
100
Pages
167-175
Language
eng
Type
Article
Physical Medium
Print-Electronic
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Conklin, A. I., Forouhi, N. G., Surtees, P., Khaw, K., Wareham, N. J., & Monsivais, P. (2014). Social relationships and healthful dietary behaviour: evidence from over-50s in the EPIC cohort, UK.. Soc Sci Med, 100 167-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.08.018
Abstract
Social relationships are an important aspect of a person's social environment that can protect against a wide range of chronic conditions and facilitate recovery from disease. Social relationships have also been linked to dietary behaviour which may be an important pathway through which social circumstances exert their influence on health. Yet, questions remain about which structural aspects of social relationships most affect healthful dietary behaviours and whether different structural components interact to produce a combined effect. Using data from adults (≥50 years) in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer-Norfolk study (1996-2002), we examined marital status, living arrangement and social isolation in relation to scores for variety of fruit and vegetable intake as a marker of diet quality associated with adverse health outcomes. Data were analysed with multivariable linear regression models for gender-specific and interaction associations. We found that being single or widowed was associated with a lower variety score, particularly vegetable variety, and associations were enhanced when combined with male gender, living alone or infrequent friend contact. Lower variety scores for lone-living were also observed, especially for men. Infrequent friend contact interacted with living arrangement to amplify negative associations of lone-living with variety, with statistically significant differences in contact frequency for vegetable variety. Lower levels of friend contact were associated with reduced variety of fruits and vegetables in a graded trend for both genders; the trend was more pronounced among men. Family contact appeared to have limited association with vegetable variety in men; among women, weekly contact was significantly and positively associated with vegetable variety compared to daily family contact. Results highlight the importance of considering living arrangement and/or frequency of social contact when assessing whether widowed, single or lone-living older adults are at risk of lower fruit and vegetable variety.
Keywords
Chronic disease, Diet variety, Gender, Health behaviour, Interactions, Social relationships, Social ties, UK, Aged, Diet, Female, Fruit, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Linear Models, Male, Marital Status, Middle Aged, Multivariate Analysis, Prospective Studies, Residence Characteristics, Sex Factors, Social Isolation, United Kingdom, Vegetables
Sponsorship
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007462/1)
Medical Research Council (G1000143)
Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12015/1)
Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12015/5)
Medical Research Council (MR/K023187/1)
Academy of Medical Sciences (unknown)
Medical Research Council (G0401527)
Department of Health (via National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)) (NF-SI-0512-10135)
Wellcome Trust (087636/Z/08/Z)
Medical Research Council (MC_U106179471)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.08.018
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/280623
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk