Uncertainties in the lightest CP even Higgs boson mass prediction in the minimal supersymmetric standard model: fixed order versus effective field theory prediction
dc.contributor.author | Allanach, BC | |
dc.contributor.author | Voigt, A | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-10-22T06:54:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-10-22T06:54:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1434-6044 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/284191 | |
dc.description.abstract | We quantify and examine the uncertainties in predictions of the lightest $CP$ even Higgs boson pole mass $M_h$ in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM), utilising current spectrum generators and including some three-loop corrections. There are two broadly different approximations being used: effective field theory (EFT) where an effective Standard Model (SM) is used below a supersymmetric mass scale, and a fixed order calculation, where the MSSM is matched to QCD$\times$QED at the electroweak scale. The uncertainties on the $M_h$ prediction in each approach are broken down into logarithmic and finite pieces. The inferred values of the stop mass parameters are sensitively dependent upon the precision of the prediction for $M_h$. The fixed order calculation appears to be more accurate below a supersymmetry (SUSY) mass scale of $M_S \approx 1.2$ TeV, whereas above this scale, the EFT calculation is more accurate. We also revisit the range of the lightest stop mass across fine-tuned parameter space that has an appropriate stable vacuum and is compatible with the lightest $CP$ even Higgs boson $h$ being identified with the one discovered at the ATLAS and CMS experiments in 2012; we achieve a maximum value of $\sim 10^{11}$ GeV. | |
dc.publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC | |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.title | Uncertainties in the lightest CP even Higgs boson mass prediction in the minimal supersymmetric standard model: fixed order versus effective field theory prediction | |
dc.type | Article | |
prism.issueIdentifier | 7 | |
prism.publicationDate | 2018 | |
prism.publicationName | European Physical Journal C | |
prism.volume | 78 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.17863/CAM.31559 | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2018-07-02 | |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6046-z | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2018-07-01 | |
dc.contributor.orcid | Allanach, Benjamin [0000-0003-4635-6830] | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1434-6052 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | |
pubs.funder-project-id | Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/P000681/1) | |
cam.issuedOnline | 2018-07-12 | |
cam.orpheus.success | Thu Jan 30 10:54:11 GMT 2020 - The item has an open VoR version. | |
rioxxterms.freetoread.startdate | 2100-01-01 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Cambridge University Research Outputs
Research outputs of the University of Cambridge