Litter removal in a tropical rain forest reduces fine root biomass and production but litter addition has few effects.
MetadataShow full item record
Rodtassana, C., & Tanner, E. (2018). Litter removal in a tropical rain forest reduces fine root biomass and production but litter addition has few effects.. Ecology, 99 (3), 735-742. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2143
Many old-growth lowland tropical rain forests are potentially nutrient limited, and it has long been thought that many such forests maintain growth by recycling nutrients from decomposing litter. We investigated this by continuously removing (for 10 yr) freshly fallen litter from five (45 m × 45 m) plots, adding it to five other plots, there were five controls. From monthly measures over 1 yr we show that litter removal caused lower: fine root (≤2 mm diameter) standing mass, fine root standing length, fine root length production and fine root length survivorship. Litter addition did not significantly change fine root mass or length or production. Nutrient concentrations in fine roots in litter removal plots were lower than those in controls for nitrogen (N), calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg), concentrations in fine roots in litter addition plots were higher for N and Ca. Chronic litter removal has resulted in reduced forest growth due to lack of nutrients, probably nitrogen. Conversely, long-term litter addition has had fewer effects.
Panama, fine root dynamics, litter-addition, litter-removal, litterfall, nitrogen, tropical forest, Biomass, Forests, Nitrogen, Plant Roots, Rainforest, Soil, Trees, Tropical Climate
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2143
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/284520
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: email@example.com