The tensile ductility of cellular Solids: The role of imperfections
View / Open Files
Authors
Ronan, W
Deshpande, VS
Fleck, NA
Publication Date
2016-12-15Journal Title
International Journal of Solids and Structures
ISSN
0020-7683
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
102-103
Pages
200-213
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Ronan, W., Deshpande, V., & Fleck, N. (2016). The tensile ductility of cellular Solids: The role of imperfections. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 102-103 200-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.10.004
Abstract
© 2016 Metallic and polymeric foams typically possess a low tensile failure strain of a few percent despite the fact that the parent solid can have high ductility (10% or more). This is remarkable as foams are bending-dominated in their structural response, and it is widely accepted that beams have a high ductility in bending compared to a bar in uniaxial tension. Possible reasons for this paradox are explored for a 2D hexagonal honeycomb, and for a so-called ‘lotus cellular material’, made from an elastic-plastic parent solid. Finite element simulations reveal that there is only a small drop in tensile ductility due to the presence of Plateau borders or due to the random misalignment of nodes; a much greater drop in ductility results from missing cell walls (equivalent to misshapen cells) or to the presence of stiff inclusions. The drop in ductility due to inclusions is associated with the multi-axial stress state that exists in their vicinity. This study emphasises the need for a uniform microstructure in order for foams to possess a high macroscopic ductility.
Keywords
Cellular foams, Elastic plastic solids, Finite element, Foam structures, Micro-mechanics, Stress strain, Tension
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.10.004
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/285425
Rights
Licence:
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk