Polygenic Risk Score for Schizophrenia and Face-Processing Network in Young Adulthood.
View / Open Files
Authors
Lieslehto, Johannes
Kiviniemi, Vesa J
Nordström, Tanja
Barnett, Jennifer H
Murray, Graham K
Jones, Peter B
Paus, Tomáš
Veijola, Juha
Publication Date
2019-06-18Journal Title
Schizophr Bull
ISSN
0586-7614
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
835-845
Language
eng
Type
Article
Physical Medium
Print
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Lieslehto, J., Kiviniemi, V. J., Nordström, T., Barnett, J. H., Murray, G. K., Jones, P. B., Paus, T., & et al. (2019). Polygenic Risk Score for Schizophrenia and Face-Processing Network in Young Adulthood.. Schizophr Bull, 45 (4), 835-845. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby139
Abstract
Development of schizophrenia relates to both genetic and environmental factors. Functional deficits in many cognitive domains, including the ability to communicate in social interactions and impaired recognition of facial expressions, are common for patients with schizophrenia and might also be present in individuals at risk of developing schizophrenia. Here we explore whether an individual's polygenic risk score (PRS) for schizophrenia is associated with the degree of interregional similarities in blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal and gray matter volume of the face-processing network and whether the exposure to early adversity moderates this association. A total of 90 individuals (mean age 22 years, both functional and structural data available) were used for discovery analyses, and 211 individuals (mean age 26 years, structural data available) were used for replication of the structural findings. Both samples were drawn from the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1986. We found that the degree of interregional similarities in BOLD signal and gray matter volume vary as a function of PRS; lowest interregional correlation (both measures) was observed in individuals with high PRS. We also replicated the gray matter volume finding. We did not find evidence for an interaction between early adversity and PRS on the interregional correlation of BOLD signal and gray matter volume. We speculate that the observed group differences in PRS-related correlations in both modalities may result from differences in the concurrent functional engagement of the face-processing regions over time, eg, via differences in exposure to social interaction with other people.
Keywords
cohort study, fMRI, face-processing, the polygenic risk score for schizophrenia, Adult, Adverse Childhood Experiences, Brain Mapping, Cohort Studies, Facial Expression, Facial Recognition, Female, Finland, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Gray Matter, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Registries, Risk, Schizophrenia, Social Perception, Young Adult
Sponsorship
Funding: The study was funded by grants from The Finnish Medical Association (author JL), Yrjö Jahnsson’s Foundation (author JL), Psykiatrian tutkimussäätiö (Finnish Foundation for Psychiatric Research), Jalmari and Rauha Ahokas Foundation, Academy of Finland (#124257, #212818, #214273) (author JV), the Sigrid Juselius Foundation (author JV), the Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation, Finland (author JV), the Alfred Kordelin Foundation (author JL), the Orion Foundation (author JL).
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby139
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/285547
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Licence URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk